what HP shuld 2007 model have???
- Thread starter bartosh
- Start date
houstonbussa
Registered
Is that 175 at the motor and after loss to the wheel it's 160?
You have standard and SAE results 160 is a good number for a stock Gen I. The gurus will be along.
Don't get caught up in dyno numbers. Too many variables and every dyno and dyno operator is different. Go ride
Don't get caught up in dyno numbers. Too many variables and every dyno and dyno operator is different. Go ride
Tony Nitrous
Registered
I know a few lad's with dyno's.
What do you want it to read ?
150? 160? 170? 180? 190? Very easy to do,
either by an bad operator or a crooked one.
There are several variables and its quite easy to get a "different"
reading from the guy down the road or even one day to the next.
Unless your putting bikes on back to back and only comparing them
to each other, folk take Dyno numbers as being waaaay to reliable.
My new 04 pulled 159.5,
My new B-King pulled 163.
(Im 100% sure I would get very different numbers if I shopped around)
Both ran well and did constant 10.3's at the strip in stock trim.
What do you want it to read ?
150? 160? 170? 180? 190? Very easy to do,
either by an bad operator or a crooked one.
There are several variables and its quite easy to get a "different"
reading from the guy down the road or even one day to the next.
Unless your putting bikes on back to back and only comparing them
to each other, folk take Dyno numbers as being waaaay to reliable.
My new 04 pulled 159.5,
My new B-King pulled 163.
(Im 100% sure I would get very different numbers if I shopped around)
Both ran well and did constant 10.3's at the strip in stock trim.
Tony Nitrous
Registered
Now be honest, your not listening are you ? . . . . . 
Your compareing a figure that a previous owner claimed or show's,
with a figure that you've had it tested at (with several variables)
against a number that you found somewhere on the internet ?
Your compareing a figure that a previous owner claimed or show's,
with a figure that you've had it tested at (with several variables)
against a number that you found somewhere on the internet ?
if it is possible just make it plain "tune" language as possible please 
Tony Nitrous
Registered
Sorry if I came across a bit harsh.
Dont think all dyno's are equal.
They SHOULD be but there are a lot of reasons for them to be different.
Some dyno's and some dyno operators will give you different numbers.
I've seen a GSXR11 lose 18hp in 2 hours being trailered from 1 dyno to another !
Its hard to compare the last owners figures, with your figures and Suzuki's
"claimed" figures when they were done on 3 different machines, by 3 different
operators, 3 different days, different altitude, temp, etc etc.
Dont think all dyno's are equal.
They SHOULD be but there are a lot of reasons for them to be different.
Some dyno's and some dyno operators will give you different numbers.
I've seen a GSXR11 lose 18hp in 2 hours being trailered from 1 dyno to another !
Its hard to compare the last owners figures, with your figures and Suzuki's
"claimed" figures when they were done on 3 different machines, by 3 different
operators, 3 different days, different altitude, temp, etc etc.
RMS2005
Registered
with nothing more than slip ons and a pc your not gonna get much better than that 160without the dyno lying to you, sure no 175 unless its a generous dyno. suzuki prolly gets there numbers from the crank and they most likely test in a facility with perfect conditions that will be hard to see in the real world. if it is running good then stop worrying about it and have fun with her.
bartosh
Registered
yeah, this bike is running silky smooth indeed. u know what... i will make pics of the dyno results, a short video of what i have on her, just to make it all clear for u experienced guys and then u will judge if i have to make some work on her or not. i will try to make it as simple as i can, i will post in here a link to youtube if i can.
thanks
thanks
Dude - give it up man! Really, it's an arbitrary number that could change for many different reasons. Why do you care if it has 10-15hp different? Enjoy your bike, forget the numbers. Damn, you're waay too caught up in this nonsense.
Jonny
Birdoprey
Registered
A stk Gen I motor(with stk exhaust) makes around 175 AT THE CRANK. I'm sure the #'s you are finding as to the Gen I "spec's" are as measured at the crank. They typically dyno 150-157ish to the wheel. Consider yourself fortunate that you are making 160 to the wheel with slip-on exhaust as most LOSE hp with the slip-ons. A PC is not gonna gain you a darn thing if your A/F is close AT WOT, which is where the dyno is measuring at. The PC CAN help your driveability considerably everywhere else though as the stk fueling is less than optimal down low and in the midrange.
The above #'s would be on a known accurate dyno with a competent operator. As has been mentioned several times above, dyno's and operators vary greatly. Also need to know if the readings you are seeing on the sheet are STD or SAE. Makes a difference.
Lots of variables...
The above #'s would be on a known accurate dyno with a competent operator. As has been mentioned several times above, dyno's and operators vary greatly. Also need to know if the readings you are seeing on the sheet are STD or SAE. Makes a difference.
Lots of variables...
Similar threads
