Wow, Check this out.
- Thread starter NCBusa2001
- Start date
to Ftu929-sorry for all thats happened, n hopefully this pr*k will spend at least as long as it takes behind bars to get a ***k up his *** so he knows what its like to get f***d. I had a rear rim bent n rode on it up to like 80, then realized something was wrong, pulled over n saw dent in rear rim-tire was losing air Psi, so rode home @ 40 on side roads til I got there n had it towed to my shop after....I thought your story was still BS cuz it read like he shot out the TIRE....what you meant was that he shot a hole in the RIM, however-this makes more sense, as the front would be unmanagable if the tire had a hole in it; riding wit no Psi tho the tire still has rubber just no air. I can believe that, cuz I know if it were me, Id be moving that bike as fast I could too. Good on ya for gettin your lady to safety, n not trying to battle it out with that guy....but if you can find his address n just "accidentally" slipped it onto the web here....good things may happen while you wait for court....Christmas IS only a few weeks away.
Man I can't believe you're chasing anyone in a cage with your wife on the back no matter how pissed you were. However, I hope the jerk that shot at you gets what he deserves. Thank God neither you or your wife were injured or killed.
Mr. Diesel you're a Grinch ............ you know the tune dude.
hayabusa99b/w
Registered
the messed up, good luck
fasternyou929
Registered
Continued again. Looks like February now.(psycobusa @ Dec. 02 2006,00:21) its december now, what day is it set for
Thanks for checking in, and for the support from the rest of you!
fasternyou929
Registered
For the supporters (I thank you again) that I promised an update:
The verdict came back: not guilty. They cobbled together a story last night and the jury bought it.
They claimed the gun I saw in his had during our verbal exchange was a camera. It was manufactured in 2006, 2 years after the incident, but the State's Attorney let that slip to the defense attorney before there was testimony on it, so that was tossed before the jury was back in the room.
He testified that he pulled to the shoulder of the road to get his cell phone out of the trunk to call the police and that I came up and parked behind him. He then got in his car to call the police, I walked up to the window and punched him, then pulled a gun on him. Then, before I could get a shot off, he got his gun out of the glove box, shot the tire out on my bike so he could escape, and took off all without a single shot striking him or his car. Nevermind the fact that I've never owned a gun.
The judge, defense, prosecution, even the defendant were expecting a guilty verdict. But there was one old man on the jury that said he sympathized with the defendant and thought "he suffered enough already". I guess we didn't and don't matter. He made up his mind from the beginning and didn't weigh the facts.... and all it takes is one.
It's like being the victims all over again.
The verdict came back: not guilty. They cobbled together a story last night and the jury bought it.
They claimed the gun I saw in his had during our verbal exchange was a camera. It was manufactured in 2006, 2 years after the incident, but the State's Attorney let that slip to the defense attorney before there was testimony on it, so that was tossed before the jury was back in the room.
He testified that he pulled to the shoulder of the road to get his cell phone out of the trunk to call the police and that I came up and parked behind him. He then got in his car to call the police, I walked up to the window and punched him, then pulled a gun on him. Then, before I could get a shot off, he got his gun out of the glove box, shot the tire out on my bike so he could escape, and took off all without a single shot striking him or his car. Nevermind the fact that I've never owned a gun.
The judge, defense, prosecution, even the defendant were expecting a guilty verdict. But there was one old man on the jury that said he sympathized with the defendant and thought "he suffered enough already". I guess we didn't and don't matter. He made up his mind from the beginning and didn't weigh the facts.... and all it takes is one.
It's like being the victims all over again.
Technically you're correct, but stating the jury system would be more accurate.
Similar threads
