steelhead
Registered
I spent hours researching the ZX-14. I tried being objective, sizing it up and understanding the nature of this motorcycle. But in the end, I thought Kawasaki did an "okay" job.
I mean, you look at a 99 Hayabusa and a 2006 ZX-14, and the 99 'busa is just a superior machine. Busa: Better engine fundamentals, more low down torque, better looks, and aerodynamically efficient. And subjectively, the Busa stands alone in its class. The ZX-14 is a "catch-up player" that could (like the little train), if that...
What was Kawasaki thinking? I am not waiting for the next Busa, I like my 2005 as it is now. The engine is amazing, how much better can they make it?
I mean, you look at a 99 Hayabusa and a 2006 ZX-14, and the 99 'busa is just a superior machine. Busa: Better engine fundamentals, more low down torque, better looks, and aerodynamically efficient. And subjectively, the Busa stands alone in its class. The ZX-14 is a "catch-up player" that could (like the little train), if that...
What was Kawasaki thinking? I am not waiting for the next Busa, I like my 2005 as it is now. The engine is amazing, how much better can they make it?