Goes9s
Registered
in one breath you want to talk about how the 14 cant be as fast as it is. then in the next breath you want to talk about how you had a honda that could run 9.5's. if you had a honda that fast(completely unstreetable btw) then why cant you believe that the 14 might be that fast.
personally i dont care how fast it is cause im a busa guy and would never own a 14. cant wait till this spring so i can go to the track a race one.
fwiw they are saying stock because the motor is stock and what exactly did they do to the 14 that everybody who gets one isnt going to do to it.
what the guy meant by his being paid for was that he could put $$ towards modding it and not a bike note.
i am tired or hearing about the 14 though. im ready to see one in person
Actually I agree with Dad of Three, what is going on in here any ways? What I said and I said very clearly, is that what Ricky did in Georgia (8.99) is not stock as Brocks claimed. What Ricky did in Vegas (9.75) was truely stock so that is the number to take note of. Stock means stock, an unmodified (mechanical, electrical or otherwise) virgin bike off the show room floor. I don't care if everyone else is modding their bike or not. If so, then it isn't stock, PERIOD!! I'm not here to get everyone wound up, I was just stating a fact that Brocks test bikes are not stock even if the only change is tuning to accommodate a fuel change.
As for the Honda comment, was it "street legal"? Technically yes, as it was lic, insured, registered and smogged. Was it streetable, absolutely! I won a ton of money at the weekend street races and "roll-ons". The Honda's max power was 716hp but had mutliple maps and 4 stage boost levels for the street and track. There were many high horsepower imports at the illegal street races and most hooked up pretty good. Was it as good as the speedway, no but still hooked.