Caps quick thoughts on Gen 3

You can't write a post like this and not share pics!!!

View attachment 1632192
I wish I had some...pictures weren't a big priority in those days.....it's not like I ever had a camera crew wanting my picture....

I didn't even get any pictures of all the deployments I was on in those days...and we did some really cool things worthy of pictures.

We used to get one 5 min phone call a week where you had to say "over" after each sentence....the last deployment I was on in Afghanistan we were able to Skype....and could do that every day if we wanted...
 
Last edited:
I am waiting patienty, already deposited, and although the initial numbers seem a bit faint, I believe that makes the "euro 5" people happy. It looks, or seems benign.

Great way to make it look appealing, in spite of it's suicidal nature. Once I receive mine, break in the rings, drop the dealer lubricant, and remove a few ditties, the ecu will be off to a good flash tuner for the initial treatment.

That will be the initial "un-neutering". Once a couple of our tuners see what's all what, we can move forward in putting the fangs back into the jawline of this fantastic machine.

I think Suzuki left much in there in spite of all the anti-publicity that seems to be driving all the owners crazy.

Let's see what is what.
Could you at least wait until some has ridden one before you throw it out!

"Exactly".
 
I know this may not be popular, but I have to wonder why they never considered an electric motorcycle.
IMO electric vehicles are going to take over someday down the road. What I believe has to happen is that
they have to not only have the infrastructure to charge the vehicles - as common as gas stations are now AND they have to make it so a 5-10 minute charge give you a full charge and full range of the battery.
The entire gas tank area could be used for more battery storage.
From what I heard, is that electric vehicles are very fast (even faster for a light MC) with almost instant power and that there is no shifting.

GM announced that by 2025 they will have 14 models of electric vehicles and by 2035 they will be 100%
electric. Motorcycles being lighter could have been a good choice and perhaps one day they will be.
I don't plan on buying a new car anytime soon BUT I think by the time I am ready it will likely be an electric one.

I know the Busa 3 has a lot of good features and is an upgrade.
But I wasn't wild about it getting worse gas mileage and a smaller gas tank size. I know it just about a quart so maybe not a big deal by itself but the lower gas mileage combined is not what I was expecting.
 
Yes but it doesn't seem plausible that a 1340 engine will outdo a 1441 and that is what we were all really hoping for.
It's already faster in the higher speed range. Starting at about 170, the busa starts walking away due to aerodynamics advantage. Even though the Kawi has more hp, it loses its advantage due to aero drag. Also, where is that Kawi in the quarter-mile, a few feet ahead! I'll find that article, I will!
 
I know this may not be popular, but I have to wonder why they never considered an electric motorcycle.
IMO electric vehicles are going to take over someday down the road. What I believe has to happen is that
they have to not only have the infrastructure to charge the vehicles - as common as gas stations are now AND they have to make it so a 5-10 minute charge give you a full charge and full range of the battery.
The entire gas tank area could be used for more battery storage.
From what I heard, is that electric vehicles are very fast (even faster for a light MC) with almost instant power and that there is no shifting.

GM announced that by 2025 they will have 14 models of electric vehicles and by 2035 they will be 100%
electric. Motorcycles being lighter could have been a good choice and perhaps one day they will be.
I don't plan on buying a new car anytime soon BUT I think by the time I am ready it will likely be an electric one.

I know the Busa 3 has a lot of good features and is an upgrade.
But I wasn't wild about it getting worse gas mileage and a smaller gas tank size. I know it just about a quart so maybe not a big deal by itself but the lower gas mileage combined is not what I was expecting.
The EV rage will create a lot of issues...the entire electrical grid has to be majorly overhauled to support these EV vehicles....many places have rolling brown outs as it is due to over taxing of the electrical grid...just imagine an entire city of even 100,000 needing to charge their EV vehicles....

Add to this the thought of self driving cars/trucks and all the hiway infrastructure will need to be overhauled to accommodate the trillions and trillions of sensors it will take to manage all these vehicles...

Where will the money come from to do all these upgrades??? It will probably take 10-15 yrs to economically recover from this pandemic.
 
Found an article about the zx12 which still had more HP than the busa but slower at the top end due to aerodynamic drag. The zx14 is mentioned and basically the same shape and near the same HP. It is long, but a good read.

Switch to full style

Post a reply

Gosling1↓

ZX14 Information post - It's A Whopper !!!​

Wed Nov 21, 2007 8:33 pm
I posted this up on CanberraRIDERS tonight, as a result of a pissing contest between myself and a good mate who owns a '05 Busa. He still thinks it's the fastest, most powerful, best-looking bike on the planet. It is heavily blinged and actually looks *OK* for a Bus. But he posted up a dyno chart where a 2007 ZX14 made 159hp, and a 2007 Bus made 175hp - apparently both stock !!
:lol:
:lol:
:lol:
and guess what? The dyno chart came from a Busa owners forum !! how incredible !!
:lol:
:lol:


In order to redress this obvious imbalance, I undertook some research, and here is the result................Enjoy !!

WARNING - ENORMOUS (but informative) POST !!!!

nice picture Max.......

I think it's time we injected some objectivity into this debate. And, an opportunity for anyone reading this thread to learn a bit about 'dynos' and what it all means.........btw this is a very long post, but very informative and almost abuse-free !! (almost )


First thing - Exactly the same bike, on the same dyno, on the same day, can return dyno figures that vary by as much as 6-8hp, depending on the conditions (low pressure, humidity, temperature, etc).

The whole point of using a dyno as a tuning tool is to determine exactly what improvements, if any, have been made to your bike, by the addition of aftermarket air filters, exhausts, PowerCommanders, etc. Just check the development of the ZX14 in the dyno charts later in this post...........and this is as good a spot as any to lay out the basics of performance upgrades:

Stock - No improvements or additions whatsoever.

Stage One - Airfilters, exhaust (either full system or end cans), PowerCommander, TRE, etc (TRE is a timing retard eliminator, allows for full ignition advance in the lower gears).

Stage Two - Engine capacity increases, headwork (porting, bigger valves etc). Improved ignition systems

Stage Three - Blowers, turbos, nitrous etc. Big-block kits.

For most punters, we never get past Stage One.....


Its important to lay down a baseline figure for your bike, so you can see what improvements have been made. It is also important that these improvements are tested *on the same dynamometer*, otherwise, you may as well piss up a rope. Different dynos can produce *wildly* varying readings, and it is not a good idea to rely on these figures.

The fact that a ZX14 was tested at 159hp, and a Bus at 170-odd, and the dyno test was sourced from a Hayabusa Owners forum, well sorry to be a bit skeptical, but heh thats just me. I am sure that a Hayabusa Owners forum would not advertise any dyno tests that showed a ZX14 to be more powerful than a Hayabusa now would they ?????

Speaking of which, here is just such a dyno chart. Sourced from SportRider, who have no vested interests at all, this chart shows a mighty different picture than the one painted by the Bus drivers......

ZX14Busdyno1.png



Both bikes stock - dynoe'd on the same day, on the same dyno - Just as per the dyno test sourced from the Bus forum.......

However in this instance, the ZX14 shows a peak hp figure of 174.7hp, and torque of 105.3ft/lb

and the underpowered Bus only comes up with 167.6hp, with a peak torque of 97.4ft/lb (although the chart looks like it says 2005 models, it is in fact 2006, just shitty resolution)


What is the point here ? Is this dyno chart any more or less valid than the one posted on the Bus forum ?? Of course not. All it shows is that on *that* particular day, on *that* particular dyno, one *particular* stock ZX14 made basically 175hp, and one *particular* stock Bus made 168hp.......


So the argument that a Bus is more powerful than a ZX14 is a whole load of crap !!..............Isn't it ?????
:lol:
It MUST be, I have the dyno charts to prove it !!
:lol:
:lol:



Anyway, moving onwards, lets have a look at some *facts* about the Hyper-Tourer brigade....


Fact # 1 - In 1999, the GSX1300R was indeed *The Fastest Motorcycle In The World*.

Fact # 2 - In 2000, the ZX12R was indeed *The Most Powerful Motorcycle In The World*......but it wasn't the fastest !! How could this be ? How could the most powerful motorcycle in the world not be the fastest ????


In order to find out, lets take a look at some quotes from Cycle Canada, who also wondered about this paradox, and did some wind testing to get to the bottom.......

Earlier this year we began to wonder about the relative aerodynamic qualities of the 2 fastest motorcycles on the market - The Suzuki Hayabusa and the Kawasaki ZX12R. The 12R in particular seemed something of a mystery, having been announced with much fanfare, yet proving to be slower in top-speed tests than the Suzuki. Some explained the result as a measure of political correctness : Kawasaki had capped the 12R's speed potential voluntarily, to avoid antagonising European authorities.

One way to help determine why the more powerful Kawasaki ZX12R was slower than the Hayabusa would be to measure aerodynamic drag in a wind tunnel. The drag measurement could then be used to calculate theoretical top speed, working with horsepower at the rear wheel and an estimate of rolling resistance.

Our greatest curiosity, however, regarded one simple question ; which bike has the most slippery shape, the Hayabusa or the ZX12R ? In previous top-speed testing at the Transport Canada speed oval, something seemed to be limiting the ZX12R's velocity to a "politically correct " 187.5 mph , which failed to match the 190.5mph we'd recorded earlier for the Hayabusa. The Suzuki had recorded 153hp at the rear wheel (NOTE - same HP as the Bus at Gecko earlier this year), while the Kawasaki had made a blistering 164.5 hp. Yet, the ZX12R was slower. Was it the much-rumored electronic speed control? Or something else?

(Please note I have bolded the important bits
;)
)

The wind tunnel provides a simple answer. What limits the ZX12R's top-end speed is aerodynamic drag. The ZX12R produces significantly more drag than the Hayabusa. The Suzuki can therefore go faster with less horsepower. It's not the threat of political intervention that has limited the top-speed of the ZX12R, but rather simply the shape and size of the motorcycle.

So, from the very outset of the Hypertourer history, the Bus had a higher top-end, due to better aerodynamics. The ZX12R was more powerful. In any event, the title of *Fastest Motorcycle* all became irrelevant in 2002, when the EU convinced all 4 Jap manufacturers to a voluntary restriction of 299kmh.
 
I know this may not be popular, but I have to wonder why they never considered an electric motorcycle.
IMO electric vehicles are going to take over someday down the road. What I believe has to happen is that
they have to not only have the infrastructure to charge the vehicles - as common as gas stations are now AND they have to make it so a 5-10 minute charge give you a full charge and full range of the battery.
The entire gas tank area could be used for more battery storage.
From what I heard, is that electric vehicles are very fast (even faster for a light MC) with almost instant power and that there is no shifting.

GM announced that by 2025 they will have 14 models of electric vehicles and by 2035 they will be 100%
electric. Motorcycles being lighter could have been a good choice and perhaps one day they will be.
I don't plan on buying a new car anytime soon BUT I think by the time I am ready it will likely be an electric one.

I know the Busa 3 has a lot of good features and is an upgrade.
But I wasn't wild about it getting worse gas mileage and a smaller gas tank size. I know it just about a quart so maybe not a big deal by itself but the lower gas mileage combined is not what I was expecting.
It would be great if the E-bike tech was up to grand touring motorcycle standards but is not. Battery size and weight constraints make it good only for urban runabouts.
although of interest some Japanese and Euro manufacturers have signed an agreement to use an interchangeable fuel cell. Although for small run about a This is progress. But I think we are about 30 years from an infrastructure and technology for a electric hyper bike.
 
Found an article about the zx12 which still had more HP than the busa but slower at the top end due to aerodynamic drag. The zx14 is mentioned and basically the same shape and near the same HP. It is long, but a good read.
"The busa is more aerodynamic", I've been hearing that for the last 13 years. I believe it's true but I wonder how much aerodynamics contributes to top speed compared to horse power. The H2 sure doesn't look aerodynamic but it hits top speed lickity split. A Gen2 ZX-14R is making over 200 hp and it looks to me like it goes from 0 to top speed as fast as a Gen2 busa. The general shape of a motorcycle isn't aerodynamic. The best shape for aeros is flat and low. Bikes are vertical and high. I'll take a more aerodynamic bike over a less aerodynamic one but I think the thing that gets you to 200 mph is hp.
 
"The busa is more aerodynamic", I've been hearing that for the last 13 years. I believe it's true but I wonder how much aerodynamics contributes to top speed compared to horse power. The H2 sure doesn't look aerodynamic but it hits top speed lickity split. A Gen2 ZX-14R is making over 200 hp and it looks to me like it goes from 0 to top speed as fast as a Gen2 busa. The general shape of a motorcycle isn't aerodynamic. The best shape for aeros is flat and low. Bikes are vertical and high. I'll take a more aerodynamic bike over a less aerodynamic one but I think the thing that gets you to 200 mph is hp.
the aero difference for a busa is more for comfort at high speed and can wear looser clothes , the liter bikes are much more refined in fairings size but relies on the rider to really tuck in tight at high speed, and you feel the air pressure more on the head and body the liters slip through the air better i thought
 
"The busa is more aerodynamic", I've been hearing that for the last 13 years. I believe it's true but I wonder how much aerodynamics contributes to top speed compared to horse power. The H2 sure doesn't look aerodynamic but it hits top speed lickity split. A Gen2 ZX-14R is making over 200 hp and it looks to me like it goes from 0 to top speed as fast as a Gen2 busa. The general shape of a motorcycle isn't aerodynamic. The best shape for aeros is flat and low. Bikes are vertical and high. I'll take a more aerodynamic bike over a less aerodynamic one but I think the thing that gets you to 200 mph is hp.
Aerodynamic drag is a big issue with many bikes that have high hp figures (Rocket 3, V Max, etc).

There has to be a fine line between power and aerodynamics....I think the Hayabusa was one of the first street bikes of which a wind tunnel came into play.

I've also read the rider comes into the aerodynamic drag, rider size and apparel including helmet shape can destabilize the "aero-bubble."

I would say the ZX14R and H2 did time in a wind tunnel as their main focus was high velocity speed. The H2 fairing reminds me of the sharp angles of a stealth fighter...even the ZX10R is using the same shape as the H2 now.
 
I believe it's true but I wonder how much aerodynamics contributes to top speed compared to horse power.


"...you talk about everybody getting more horsepower, '5 more horsepower get me a couple more miles an hour...' you do something as simple as tuck your elbows a half an inch in and it buys you like 3 more miles an hour which at speeds over 170 would probably cost you about 15 horsepower just to achieve that type of gain."
 
Aerodynamic drag is a big issue with many bikes that have high hp figures (Rocket 3, V Max, etc).

There has to be a fine line between power and aerodynamics....I think the Hayabusa was one of the first street bikes of which a wind tunnel came into play.

I've also read the rider comes into the aerodynamic drag, rider size and apparel including helmet shape can destabilize the "aero-bubble."

I would say the ZX14R and H2 did time in a wind tunnel as their main focus was high velocity speed. The H2 fairing reminds me of the sharp angles of a stealth fighter...even the ZX10R is using the same shape as the H2 now.
Yes, if you look at the shape of a rider tucked with the hump on the back rather than the rear seat, it's a dome or half circle. The old Volkswagon beetle was and still is the most aerodynamic shape and Suzuki mimicked it. The wind tunnel doesn't lie. Now, the busa is FASTER not more powerful than the ZX14. Thanks Hayabusawannabe
 
Find the side-by-side pic of gen2 and gen3. Look close and you will see at least 5 different areas of extensive wind tunnel testing. Other bike makers simply address the heat issue like the BMW1000rr. Suzuki addressed that too, as the heat comes out a foot instead of the knee level. The gen3 has much smoother lines from front to back. This bike took a long time to come out like years, but look at all the advancements in so many areas!! Our perception of HP is the pull or torque. Due to all the changes in the bike, rpm, the gen3 will FEEL like it has more HP. Call summit or jegs and tell them you want an engine kit to supe up your vehicle and the first question is, do you want HP or torque? The prime example is the triumph rocket 3. A fair amount of HP, but is so much torque like 160-foot lb, but is 165hp, feels like it has 400HP. So, I have the feeling when we get on the gen3 and wind up from about 6-9k, it will feel like more HP than gen1 or 2.
 
Find the side-by-side pic of gen2 and gen3. Look close and you will see at least 5 different areas of extensive wind tunnel testing. Other bike makers simply address the heat issue like the BMW1000rr. Suzuki addressed that too, as the heat comes out a foot instead of the knee level. The gen3 has much smoother lines from front to back. This bike took a long time to come out like years, but look at all the advancements in so many areas!! Our perception of HP is the pull or torque. Due to all the changes in the bike, rpm, the gen3 will FEEL like it has more HP. Call summit or jegs and tell them you want an engine kit to supe up your vehicle and the first question is, do you want HP or torque? The prime example is the triumph rocket 3. A fair amount of HP, but is so much torque like 160-foot lb, but is 165hp, feels like it has 400HP. So, I have the feeling when we get on the gen3 and wind up from about 6-9k, it will feel like more HP than gen1 or 2.
Both previous generations spent lots of time in a wind tunnel as well....they aren't exactly rolling bricks.
 
Both previous generations spent lots of time in a wind tunnel as well....they aren't exactly rolling bricks.
Yep I think the gen 3's going to be a great bike in the same way a gen 2 is, minus a little top end power, with some whizbang electronics most will never use, a nice (imo) cosmetic upgrade, and a not so nice price increase. If you are a busa fan with some (or a lot?) of disposable income lying around, and want a shiny new toy, it should fit the bill nicely.

But it feels like Suzuki knew the 14R was going to be discontinued, and knew they needed to give us something shiny and new, but also knew they'd be the only player in the game, so they just put some new clothes and some electronic toys on a gen 2, raised the price a lot, and called it a money grab.

I'm sure it'll be a fun bike to ride, my only complaint is the huge increase in price for a slightly detuned (but better looking imo) gen 2. But if they would have added all the electronics to a gen 2, and tried to charge gen 3 prices for it, it would have flopped.

Those marketing guys definitely know what they're doing :bowdown:
 
I love those whizbang electronics, have from 10-year old till now @65. Now the electronics package on this bike rivals the best out there, better to me than the BMW1000RR electronic package. It's going to be easier to navigate the software that's for sure. I've always been reluctant to really get down on this rocket in first gear, but I know I can set to no wheelie and get on this thing feeling confident the front won't swing over me in a nanosecond. I got down on my retired 2002 silver gray one time in first. I shifted my weight forward and I'm here to tell you, I saw the front of me going so fast in an instant, and even at 38 years old, it was a mental hand full because everything happens really fast., it was like a true rocket that it is. Also, the traction control on the rear wheel should be able to help with a high side. I remember honking along at 179mph down I-12 in Louisiana, freshly paved, smooooth! Well, at about 1/2 mile, I see a car from the right lane move to the left lane, which is where we were, another 02 busa and I. When I saw the car go into the left lane, I put the brakes on so hard front and back, the bike was severely vibrating front to back, a bike with 1000 miles on it, so brand new. I thought it was going to go head over because I'm sure I was using front more but was close to optimal. We covered in few seconds, a half-mile!! We almost rear-ended that car. It was the 1st time I had ever been close to 180 for a couple of miles and with this new anti-flip, I won't be worried about putting the front brakes on too hard. So, yes, I love them electronics for sure. That feeling that day felt like the first time, yup, looking forward to it! See, it was a long story, but we should talk like this so we can learn stuff from each other.
 
Yep I think the gen 3's going to be a great bike in the same way a gen 2 is, minus a little top end power, with some whizbang electronics most will never use, a nice (imo) cosmetic upgrade, and a not so nice price increase. If you are a busa fan with some (or a lot?) of disposable income lying around, and want a shiny new toy, it should fit the bill nicely.

But it feels like Suzuki knew the 14R was going to be discontinued, and knew they needed to give us something shiny and new, but also knew they'd be the only player in the game, so they just put some new clothes and some electronic toys on a gen 2, raised the price a lot, and called it a money grab.

I'm sure it'll be a fun bike to ride, my only complaint is the huge increase in price for a slightly detuned (but better looking imo) gen 2. But if they would have added all the electronics to a gen 2, and tried to charge gen 3 prices for it, it would have flopped.

Those marketing guys definitely know what they're doing :bowdown:
The price for the Hayabusa may have increased but it is on par with other bikes out there.

In the end, it is still a Hayabusa, the best version yet so that's always a good thing. If the aftermarket supports it the same as the other generations, it will be a huge hit...
 
I love those whizbang electronics, have from 10-year old till now @65. Now the electronics package on this bike rivals the best out there, better to me than the BMW1000RR electronic package. It's going to be easier to navigate the software that's for sure. I've always been reluctant to really get down on this rocket in first gear, but I know I can set to no wheelie and get on this thing feeling confident the front won't swing over me in a nanosecond. I got down on my retired 2002 silver gray one time in first. I shifted my weight forward and I'm here to tell you, I saw the front of me going so fast in an instant, and even at 38 years old, it was a mental hand full because everything happens really fast., it was like a true rocket that it is. Also, the traction control on the rear wheel should be able to help with a high side. I remember honking along at 179mph down I-12 in Louisiana, freshly paved, smooooth! Well, at about 1/2 mile, I see a car from the right lane move to the left lane, which is where we were, another 02 busa and I. When I saw the car go into the left lane, I put the brakes on so hard front and back, the bike was severely vibrating front to back, a bike with 1000 miles on it, so brand new. I thought it was going to go head over because I'm sure I was using front more but was close to optimal. We covered in few seconds, a half-mile!! We almost rear-ended that car. It was the 1st time I had ever been close to 180 for a couple of miles and with this new anti-flip, I won't be worried about putting the front brakes on too hard. So, yes, I love them electronics for sure. That feeling that day felt like the first time, yup, looking forward to it! See, it was a long story, but we should talk like this so we can learn stuff from each other.
well each to their own i guess personally have no desire for electronics, abs is standard on anything anyway, ive never had it would be advantageous tho , I was doing powerslides last weekend and when in he mood trying to improve my wheelies on odd occasions, i love talking and riding with guys who drop big coin on top spec bikes with electronic ohlins, full upgrade packages. Now with it seems exotic software that use multi layer screens for adjusting functions for pre-setting a specific ride which can program traction control number, suspension settings and power , wheelie control number, straight out of motogp which is more common or just about progressing to the bikes which are in and around the same ballpark price market as the gen 3.
All this stuff for the big spenders is out there but what i like about the gen 3 is that its so conservative in the software area and is easily turned on/off, I think there is a good bike in the gen 3 but nothing major in terms of a must have from a gen 2
 
Having now owned all 3 Generations i'd honestly say if you could get the same suspension parts into a Gen 2 and aren't the sort to benefit from gadgets then you'd have a peach of a Gen 2.
Gen 1 was epic bar its brakes...loved it in every way for being just special and probably the easiest bike with plastics i've owned to service...racked up big miles with ease.
Gen 2 for me wasn't a real step up from the Gen 1, extra power was nice but the bike felt a bit clumsy at low speed compared to the G1 and was too sensitive to tyres...wrong profile tyres made it like a super tanker to turn but the right tyre made it extra agile....mode switch was a gimmick and 30 seconds after trying it you just chose Mode A.
Still easy maintenance and fairly low running costs.
Gen 3 is really agile yet plush, gadgets don't get in the way and apart from the QS you never really notice them...midrange power is silly addictive...
is it the best Gen, i don't know...too early to tell and wouldn't be fair to dismiss the older Gens simple because their older .. i had them for years, tried ZZR/ ZX14 in both guises and came back to the Busa each time so for me another Busa was the only real answer
Hopefully the Gen 3 remains solid and reliable, certainly feels well bolted together mechanically...didn't hear a signal panel squeak or knock all week....then again i was giggling too much most of the time.
 
Back
Top