Do tell of this other tech. I'm only aware of a clutch or some version of a torque converter. I once read an article where an electrically charged fluid could change viscosity to lock up the drive.
Do tell of this other tech. I'm only aware of a clutch or some version of a torque converter. I once read an article where an electrically charged fluid could change viscosity to lock up the drive.
That's something that I've been mulling over. The torque-converter-based automatic prevalent in cars is an unholy mess of inefficiency designed to convert brake shoes into dust and gasoline into waste heat. (more so than the engine itself already does on it's own)
The engine I've described in this thread is a cut-down version of an engine that I'd eventually like to have in a car, and at one point I had considered starting my own car company. I may still do so in the future, but for now the automotive landscape is changing far faster than my ability to plan can keep up with. (And as an anarchist, I have no patience for government regulation) But I digress.
It occurred to me that not everyone has the mental wiring to handle a clutch. But how to avoid a slushbox? Computer-controlled clutch it was.
I suppose I'd have to see a working version to understand the principles of it. Explanations never jived with me much.The title will most probably put you off, why it is missed by so many, but scroll down and play with the sliders and you will see no clutch no nada.
There is the option to take out the electrical motors and replace with hydraulic devices if battery weight is a problem.
BMW future prototypes with high performance is following the same concept. Besides efficiency, the main advantage is you can immediately spool up a high RPM motor into its power range and use the maximum available power that will not break wheel traction. Nothing slips, direct drive and no heat is generated and it is pretty efficient.
Another way to explain this is a gearbox without a clutch, with an infinite transmission ratio.
Toyota Prius - Power Split Device
I suppose I'd have to see a working version to understand the principles of it. Explanations never jived with me much.
I guess I don't get the "infinite" ratios with the planetary gearing. You could have different ratios depending on whether you drove the little gears or the larger center shaft but the relative ratios are fixed. What am I missing?
I meant that, without the gas guzzler, MG1 and MG2 in the models, I can't picture how the Prius uses this to do it's thing.Planetary gears is an old concept, what makes a difference today is the availability of advanced control engineering to use them to their full extent. By controlling the the different gears in the system, you can have infinite transmission ratios, both in forward and reverse, no clutch.
Actually, no, those things SUCK power pretty badly. I've put 26,500 into the Burgman 400, and it's single has a lot of potential which is wasted on the CVT. And at least in Suzuki's variation, it was not possible to achieve high revs until sufficient velocity had been gained, with the engine staying below 5k until well past 35 mph.Here is some more narrative, Nissan uses a design I would not use, but the output is somewhat similar. It is not planetary though and will not be as reliable.
Definitions: Continuously Variable Transmission (CVT) - Autotrader
Well, unlike typical reasons for building a truly custom, from the ground up engine (HP bragging rights), my goal is to test some theories rattling around in my brain meats, that if correct, (and the builder was competent in his craft AND tuning), would give me MPG bragging rights. Plus, if you've happened to glance at the doc, said engine has 12 CYLINDERS. There are some smooth bikes out there, but I seriously doubt any that are that smooth.10 grand, the only build ull get for that is a bike with a whole drilled in the air fiter box.when u said 10k u lost everyone lol, and todo something comparable to a 650, why? the fellows including me thought u were talking about what i ACTUALLY did.
old thread... but I got a good laugh here.... 10 grand fellas.... lolStultifying, is a brief way of describing the last five years.
As far as my budget and the engine, I want to say $10k? But that could be flexible. As for the design? I made a Doc. And I was talking specifically about a motorcycle engine, I'm just not sure what chassis I plan to put it in.
And the goal is to prove a theory I have, that larger cylinder counts are more thermally efficient than fewer, and to try to get >150mpg on the roads with a reasonably powerful engine.
3D printing will soon make this type of project commonplace. Ability to rapidly itterate designs without need of costly tooling or machining(mostly).