i know this is an old thread but i deided to give my i opinion...
i have a custom 04 busa and wrecked it last night by using the front brake only.
migh have been my fault for maybe squeezing the lever to hard/quickly
but none the less the front wheel locked up and slide right and i went left.
pick up in front of me stopped either hard or i just wasnt payin attention. truthfully dont know which it was but the out come
was bike obviously ended up on its left side and i ended up my well i dont even know how i landed but i know everything on my left side is hurting today.erybody has one.
i vote for use both breaks 60 rear and 40 front just in my opinion tho. of course opinions are like buttholes,everybody has one.
safety first koolness second!!!
From what I've seen, most are going to use what experience teaches (or someone convinces you) is the best method of stopping. Until a rider experiences a different set of circumstances, most will keep using what works until it doesn't. When braking methods fail in a situation (locked rear, lowside, etc) it is an opportunity to do some research and see if you could have done it differently and improved your situation.
Street riding and track riding both provide opportunity for braking. With track riding you get to practice every lap approaching every turn. Very repeatable events. You can try different methods. Most track riders never use the rear at all. Loaded up fronts mean your rear is unloaded and adding a rear brake to that normally means a learning opportunity that is going to hurt a bit.
Yep, the thread that just won't quit.
I once tried the "lock the front when setting up for T1 in the rain at Barber" method. Didn't like that method at all. I had been easing on the front brakes for a second or two when it just locked up. A little too much for the conditions, I guess.
That resulted in a pucker factor overload, but it also proved that a high speed front tire skid does not necessarily lead to a crash.
Sorry that's off topic, but it was a good learning experience.
Really, I mean REALLLLY, we are beating a dead horse here.
I usually use both, but with my previous bike I locked up the rears 3 times. It freaked me out, so I don't use the rears as heavily as I once did. But, for regular street riding, I would think that using both brakes would be safer and will allow for quicker stopping when necessary. That's what I was always told, and so far it seems correct. Did I see a post above saying that "it ain't necessarily so"?