Cookie
Registered
The only reason Suzuki replaced Aluminum subframes was because the very few that HAD broke were so pronounced and publicized.(thrasherfox @ Jun. 19 2007,07:56) As much as I enjoy my hayabusa, and while I am a Suzuki fan and have only owned Suzuki's all my life.
Even Suzuki comes out with a totally new hayabusa with more power, more bling more everything!! AND even if I had the money and was in an awesome position to purchase a new and awesomely improved 08 model, I still would wait for a year or two.
The Hayabusa as it stands is an awesome bike, but even it had a few problems when it first came. First thing that comes to mind is its aluminum sub frame. Nice and light for sure, however they didn’t take a whole lot of stress, and I don’t think I would want to be on a bike when the sub frame cracked.
So yeah a totally kick but brand new, awesome looking hayabusa would have to be street tested by others for a year or more before I got one.
Do you know ANYONE that had one break!? Doubt it seriously. I know a guy that rode his 5'10" g/f on his 2000 for years at high speeds and never once had an issue with his breaking.
It was all random and toss of the dice to the weld on each of those few aluminum subframes that hit the market. Suzuki just CYA'd themselves by replacing to the steel subframe to quell the masses.
Besides, this new Hayabusa has been sitting WAITING for the right time release for a while now. Do you actually think that Suzuki would release a 'barley thought out and ugly at that shamble like the ZX14R and fall to large criticisms like that bike? I don't think so.