I agree with that in theory for the every day Joe driving down the road, but if you're PAID to serve and protect and your job is to pursue (i.e. there aren't laws or departmental policies to not chase), I have a tough time not passing blame to the motorcyclist. I truly hope he is caught and has a price to pay...and who knows, time may show that the pursuing officer in this case did something drastic in his maneuvers to warrant disciplinary actions as well...I just can't absolve that rider that's now MIA...(Cblast @ May 31 2007,16:14) Absolutely, debate is good for the mental acuity. If I decide to violate traffic lights, laws, speed limits, whatever in pursuit of another individual doing the same thing and I crash into a bridge abutment and I kill myself, then it is my fault for the decision that I made to compound anothers mistake by following him in his irresponsible action.
I am tempted to ask for this to be written above my Avatar.(Big E @ May 31 2007,13:15) "That janks is retareted."
(Cblast @ May 31 2007,16:20)I am tempted to ask for this to be written above my Avatar.(Big E @ May 31 2007,13:15) "That janks is retareted."
I do agree with that wholeheartedly, but as bad as it is, there are always scenarios where "collateral damage" occurs...some could certainly be avoided, as in this case had he chosen to not chase, but again, it's all so easy for us to sit back and judge not knowing all of the facts, not knowing what he's been told he should or must do, not knowing what that rider had done to warrant a chase...it'll all wash out eventually and it is so easy for me to sit and chat about this since I'm not the one that just lost a loved one...I do have to admit to that...it's a damn shame no matter how you dice it up and I truly feel that those families are in agony over this and wish like hell that cop hadn't pursued...(Cblast @ May 31 2007,16:23) Exactly, he killed the people he should have been serving and protecting, he did, no else was parked on a pedestrian. He should have remembered the words "To Protect", not to maim and kill as I pursue a runner. That is what backup and choppers and radios are for.
I am with you 100 percent and I will be praying for all involved, this was a great discussion and thanks again to the Org for providing us with a venue to discuss and to vent when we all need a place to do so.(VaBusa @ May 31 2007,13:30)I do agree with that wholeheartedly, but as bad as it is, there are always scenarios where "collateral damage" occurs...some could certainly be avoided, as in this case had he chosen to not chase, but again, it's all so easy for us to sit back and judge not knowing all of the facts, not knowing what he's been told he should or must do, not knowing what that rider had done to warrant a chase...it'll all wash out eventually and it is so easy for me to sit and chat about this since I'm not the one that just lost a loved one...I do have to admit to that...it's a damn shame no matter how you dice it up and I truly feel that those families are in agony over this and wish like hell that cop hadn't pursued...(Cblast @ May 31 2007,16:23) Exactly, he killed the people he should have been serving and protecting, he did, no else was parked on a pedestrian. He should have remembered the words "To Protect", not to maim and kill as I pursue a runner. That is what backup and choppers and radios are for.
+1000(Rayabusa0818 @ May 31 2007,08:41)+1 Well said(BusaWhipped @ May 31 2007,11:34)I agree that the biker needs to he held accountable for his actions: speeding, reckless driving, evading, and probably a few more that should take him off the streets for a while. But the cop also needs to be held accountable for his actions as well. The officer should be trained to make good decisions whether to pursue or not. In this case, it appears that the cop's decision to pursue was not a good one. Radio is faster than rubber, but you don't get the adrenalin rush from pressing a mic key.(VaBusa @ May 31 2007,07:58) I may be the minority here, but I do believe that motorcyclist, if ever found, should be held accountable...
ike, not to argue brother, but I need to see the video. The lawsuits would be horrendous, not to mention it violates the Constitution. The only time this might work is a fleeing felon that presents an imminent danger to the public.(ike @ May 31 2007,19:10) I don't believe the biker should be held accountable if his vehicle wasn't the one that caused the mess. I know for sure some leo's will use their car to stop a biker by running into them and I don't wanna hear the crap that they do it at low speeds either. It should not be done at any speeds. I know of guy's who ran at crazy speeds cause of some leo trying to hit them at crazy speeds and missed. At that point they were running for their well being and lives. I'm not saying that they shouldn't be chased if a serious crime was committed but hell I don't think white lining or some other minor stuff really constitutes an all out chase cause then shid like this could happen. Unless the guy on the bike killed someone they shouldn't be chased at high speeds. Don't get me wrong everyone. I don't believe anyone should run but it happens. It was the leo that made the mess. He lost control of his vehicle. Could you imagine if he lost control with his gun. Who's fault would it be then? Just my opinion.
Today on one of the D.C. area news sites I saw that they referred to the bike as a "black race bike"...(forceofnature @ May 31 2007,22:16) They never stated it was a sportbike only that it was a dark bike this time.