and i am NOT baby sitting your kids!
sure we will Ace, just think of all the things we could teach them in a couple hours
and i am NOT baby sitting your kids!
sure we will Ace, just think of all the things we could teach them in a couple hours
1.)Well, as far as I can tell, no one is advocating a rated G site, just a respectful one. No vulgarity, no need for the F word,
2.)and whether some like it here or not, 10,000 pages of smilies and then so many good topics going completely south with a ton of ??? and gets old. If guys here are truly THAT upset over post counts, perhaps we should turn 'em off. They don't matter. I lost some in the recent changes, but who cares? Funny, we've been called "a bunch of 8 year olds" here this week, and then we have those same members crying about a post count? Ironic...
3.)No one here needs to spell out what's wrong with a photo of that gal and a beer bottle. It was vulgar and whether some agree with that assessment or not is irrelevant;
4.) it only ended up here after on a dare elsewhere in cyberspace and that speaks VOLUMES. Seriously, everyone here knows what that action references so trying to blur that line is just childish.
5.)So tell me, exactly where is the "fun" being denied here? We want respectful exchanges, fun and less drama. I guess I don't see why that is so hard to understand.
Dude.....they live with Randy....what could you teach them that he hasn't already? LOL
it only ended up here after on a dare elsewhere in cyberspace and that speaks VOLUMES
**Edit** A preface, if you will; Michelle.. I've talked to you on and off for over 5 years now. I've always thought you were a sweetie. No issues with you whatsoever, but that doesn't mean I can't disagree with you.
Didn't say you couldn't, but I thought a reply to your post was acceptable; don't recall seeing me say anywhere in my reply that you can't disagree with me.
1.) I do not think anyone here will disagree with having respect. Again..that is not the root of our current issue IMO.
Actually, if you 1/10 of the things that go on behind the big curtains here, you would know we've lost a lot of members BECAUSE of a perceived lack of respect across the board. We are working really hard to get that back. That you don't see it does not mean others don't see it or that it doesn't exist.
2.) You don't like emiticons? I disagree completely with this statement.. emiticons are part of the fun.. do those posts take up too much room on the board? Hey... nuke the emiticon only posts.. but I'll repeat my previous question; What was the reasoning behind the removal of post counts? (I know what it looks like to some of the members..see #5 below) but why do it in the first place? Again..a move that is percieved as negative by many, has no positive result, and as such...dumb.
I love smilies; I use 'em often, but a few here find it a mission to post up as many as possible JUST TO up their post count. I don't know why this became fun, so we allowed the "Any Subject Thread" hoping it would be contained there, but perfectly good threads would turn in to page after page of smilies and even the person that began those threads would wonder why we're allowing it to be ruined with what is a blatant attempt to just up a post count. I'm not against people posting up a smilie as their only reply; I do it often myself, but I don't do it over and over and over again just because I crave a high number of posts next to my profile. If the biggest issue is that post counts were lost, I say in the big scheme of things here, the friends we make, the rides we coordinate, the things we do for one another, if THAT is the biggest worry, well, it's laughable to me. The posts were lost when thousands of post 'ho threads were moved to a forum where they no longer count. It's that simple. We didn't run through a list of members and just opt to delete x amount of posts to be irritating. We moved threads to forums where they no longer count, hoping that if people want to still go and post up smilie after smilie, do it to your heart's content, but it's not making your post count go up. It's a deterrent, plain and simple. I've heard more positive than negative about this new rule, and I'm sorry you do not agree with it.
3.) That may be YOUR opinion...but it is one that is certainly not shared by others.
It's not JUST MY OPINION, it is the opinion of everyone that is helping steer the oRg where we want it to be. If you don't like that answer, perhaps the owner of the oRg can make it more clear. Perhaps there's still a misconception that myself, and others that help out just wing it and do what we feel without talking to others first. I assure you, that is so far from the truth.
4.) Uh.... no. The avatar that was put on after this one was taken off was the "dare". (ya know...the one that got a member banned? Stick figure?) ......Brought on by the removal of bottle girl.
Funny, I know the sequence of events and we can go all the way back to the place where the dare was posted, what was posted here first, what was posted second and so on, but what does that do? It clutters up the oRg with exactly what we don't want anymore. If members here don't like it here, no one's duct taped you to the site. If members want to go bash us elsewhere, they can do that too, but don't think for a second others don't see what's happening here, who's pushing limits on dares and then who pretends it was all innocent and they don't understand why it was pulled. Funniest part is that photo (both actually) would never be acceptable here, under the old rules or the new ones.
5.) We are all for less drama, more respect, and fun. Over moderation removes fun. Kinda the way a badge happy cop makes a crappy officer...they don't garner respect.
Some of this goes back to the adage; "do what I say and not what I do". You're talking about "junk" posts.. too many emiticons, threads going south etc..
I start an honest discussion about issues currently facing this board, and so far, there have been 17 admin/mod/cap posts. Of that 17, 5 have been on topic. The rest are thread jacks, and by your definition... "junk" posts.. emiticons and all. So see? Even the mods/admins like to keep it light...have fun.
No one has ever said we don't like to have fun...they are not and page after page, therein lies the difference.
Not to sound like a broken record..but that is why we are here. It's FUN.
Over moderation, being too big for ones britches, hypocrisy, and turning a blind eye to some, while lambasting others = things that REMOVE the fun.
Hey, that was a "sixth letter of the alphabet followed by several asterisk-ing" double dog dare, a mans got his pride, he's gotta step up to the plate when the double dog dare gauntlet been tossed to the ground, Why if it wasn't for the double dog, train trestles spanning rivers across America would remain unjumped from, and how sad is that.
You know, I haven't had so much fun since I deliberately ignored Becky Calhoun in the seventh grade when she said hi in the hallway between third and fourth period.
cheers
ken
3.) That may be YOUR opinion...but it is one that is certainly not shared by others.
4.) Uh.... no. The avatar that was put on after this one was taken off was the "dare". (ya know...the one that got a member banned? Stick figure?) ......Brought on by the removal of bottle girl.
About a year or so back, Captain declared, "This is a Christian board." I don't recall what triggered this assertion, however, that statement alone was adequate to make it all but clear:
I challenge you to find that post where I said that this was a Christian only forum...
Cap
I liked your post Wag.
But worth the read.Well, that turned a lot longer than I intended!
--Wag--
Not looking for a fight here but I believe this is what I think this is what Wag was talking about. This is just a snippet from the post.
https://www.hayabusa.org/forum/random-thoughts/103341-what-we-becoming-we-determine-outcome.html
Here are a few things that are changing tonight.... Consider this the public notice.......
2. Religion........ I hear one negative word about my one and only GOD then just expect your account to go.... If you don't like it and can't hold your words then go open your own athiest Busa forum... It seems there are a lot of you out there! I will not allow your smart alec comments to be a part of this site any longer.
We need to clean things up and help our fellow man... Who's with me?
Cap
It doesnt say you cant discuss things.. It says NEGATIVE words... This all came into play for the very reasons we discussed... There were a few people that were speaking down to ANYONE of ANY faith... There is no needs to speak negatively about anyone's faith or anyone in general... When you start talking down to people then the problems start.... Ask questions, have discussions but don't attack..... This is the same problem that we have today as Feb of 09 ...... People have a hard time putting the facts into a post without also putting someone down at the same time.... I have had some FANTASTIC discussions with a lot of people on this forum over the years about their beliefs but never did I tell them they were wrong or did I belittle their beliefs... You can have a mature discussion without putting someone else down or dropping an F bomb.... Right? People need to express their thoughts, make sure they over communicate that this is not an attack but what their opinion is....I hear one negative word about my one and only GOD then just expect your account to go
Question on the reply please: What defines your one and only God? Is this the Christian God, Muslim God, Hindu...in short how should we put that statement in context? context?
Again I remember when this post came out and there was a lot of issues flying around the site as is related in the rest of that original post. I did take away from this post the Org was a Christian based site only and it sounds like others did to. With that said, I think this is where some of the confusion is coming from in how the Org is now being perceived.
Good intentions does not make for good actions if the message is not clear.