And there lies the problem.You are not from California, thus you exhibited typical behavior.As said before, illegal in Washington but even if it was I still wouldn't do it. It's simply unsafe because you never know what a cager is going to do. Maybe at low speed to get through congestion, but to merely pass somebody because they aren't going fast enough? Come on.
I still remember my last trip to California. I almost ran two motorcycles over when making a right hand turn, they decided to pull up on my right to make their own turn because I wasn't going fast enough. One ended up going into the ditch, the other emergency stopped and started threatening me until I got out and he realized I was twice his size. Point is I was looking for pedestrians and bicycles, not the motorbike that was parked behind me just a half second ago.
I can see where it has it's purpose, like standstill traffic or slow moving congestion. It gets bikes out of harms way and off the roads to free up the vehicles, but the problem is that people then start using it to pass vehicles on open roads at speeds that they shouldn't be splitting lanes at. Too many idiots allready on bikes, I don't need one of them under my vehicle.
Californian drivers are more likely to be aware of the possiblity of a motorcycle "materializing" out of thin air next to them.
People from the rest of the US are not so inclined unless that are riders themselves.
Not flaming you but take the bus next time. Every location has it's own style of driving. Dont go some where else and play cop by enforcing YOUR driving styles upon them. Either join them or join the bus club.And there lies the problem.You are not from California, thus you exhibited typical behavior.As said before, illegal in Washington but even if it was I still wouldn't do it. It's simply unsafe because you never know what a cager is going to do. Maybe at low speed to get through congestion, but to merely pass somebody because they aren't going fast enough? Come on.
I still remember my last trip to California. I almost ran two motorcycles over when making a right hand turn, they decided to pull up on my right to make their own turn because I wasn't going fast enough. One ended up going into the ditch, the other emergency stopped and started threatening me until I got out and he realized I was twice his size. Point is I was looking for pedestrians and bicycles, not the motorbike that was parked behind me just a half second ago.
I can see where it has it's purpose, like standstill traffic or slow moving congestion. It gets bikes out of harms way and off the roads to free up the vehicles, but the problem is that people then start using it to pass vehicles on open roads at speeds that they shouldn't be splitting lanes at. Too many idiots allready on bikes, I don't need one of them under my vehicle.
Californian drivers are more likely to be aware of the possiblity of a motorcycle "materializing" out of thin air next to them.
People from the rest of the US are not so inclined unless that are riders themselves.
I'm not used to it and niether are Canadian drivers which we have up here...and to be honest, they are crazy drivers. Those guys will try to run a train off it's tracks if it means saving a few seconds, and there aint no way in hell I'd try to lane split knowing they could be near by.
Also, for the person who says that I can't ***** about dangers if I haven't tried it....so, I gotta kill somebody with a gun before I can know it's dangerous to point a loaded weapon at somebody?Logic rocks.
All I know is that when in Cali, every other car that passed me I thought was being chased by a cop with how they drove. Maybe I saw the worst you guy's had to offer traffic wise, but I couldn't see lane splitting being safe in those conditions. Like I said, maybe at a slow crawl..but not at the speeds I was going.
that guy doesnt care about his own saftey little alone yoursBikes should always stay as far away as possible from cars, period..
To do anything less is to leave your destiny in the hands of the guy behind the wheel.. In my expereince that guy behind the wheel on purpose or by accident does not have my best interests "health wise" at heart.
Also truthfully, if were riding such high performance machines capable of such speed and acceleration and we are afraid or unsure about or ability to safely split a lane we probaly should not be riding the Busa..
Just my own personal opinion, not meant to be applied to any one else..
There is no 'lane splitting law' in California or anywhere else that I'm aware of. Its always up to the LEO's discretion as to how well you share the lanes. All of them that I've spoken to about it, at least 7-8, mostly CHP officers, said that no faster than 15 mph is all they'll allow and that's only when its called for, again, in their opinion.I thought the lane splitting law in cali was that you can only do it traffic that is stopped, like at a red light, traffic jams, etc..am I wrong?
Check this out...There is no 'lane splitting law' in California or anywhere else that I'm aware of. Its always up to the LEO's discretion as to how well you share the lanes. All of them that I've spoken to about it, at least 7-8, mostly CHP officers, said that no faster than 15 mph is all they'll allow and that's only when its called for, again, in their opinion.I thought the lane splitting law in cali was that you can only do it traffic that is stopped, like at a red light, traffic jams, etc..am I wrong?
There are those that simply outrun and weave thru traffic most anytime they feel like it but that's not true lane splitting. In the eyes of most LEOs (and other drivers) its just reckless riding. 'Proper' lane splitting would be in heavy traffic with everyone going v e r y slowly or gridlocked. Trying to ride on the edge of one lane is also recommended when possible, instead of weaving in and out of the two lanes available to you. But under the best of circumstances, you will have to go back and forth more than you want.
BTW, does anyone in your state refer to it as flori?
What cops are you talking to? Every one of the ones I ride with down here think it's a great idea when done safely. It's the motor units in CA that continually fight keep it allowable not the citizens. I have four Cops in my family and two on the block here and they all say there is NO speed guidance only that you operate your conveyance in a safe manner.There is no 'lane splitting law' in California or anywhere else that I'm aware of. Its always up to the LEO's discretion as to how well you share the lanes. All of them that I've spoken to about it, at least 7-8, mostly CHP officers, said that no faster than 15 mph is all they'll allow and that's only when its called for, again, in their opinion.I thought the lane splitting law in cali was that you can only do it traffic that is stopped, like at a red light, traffic jams, etc..am I wrong?
There are those that simply outrun and weave thru traffic most anytime they feel like it but that's not true lane splitting. In the eyes of most LEOs (and other drivers) its just reckless riding. 'Proper' lane splitting would be in heavy traffic with everyone going v e r y slowly or gridlocked. Trying to ride on the edge of one lane is also recommended when possible, instead of weaving in and out of the two lanes available to you. But under the best of circumstances, you will have to go back and forth more than you want.
BTW, does anyone in your state refer to it as flori?