How about a specific, clear explanation of the disciplinary procedure?
Something like this would leave little room for members to question disciplinary actions, or to scream "favoritism" when someone is suspended or banned.
I'll use rules #1 and #3 as examples...
(1) Abusive and vulgar language is prohibited. Any attempt to modify the actual word or convey the meaning of such that is deemed inappropriate by the Administrators and Moderators of this board is prohibited.
1st Offense: 5 Day Suspension
2nd Offense: 15 Day Suspension
3rd Offense: PERMANENT BAN
3) Pornography is strictly prohibited. Content (including photographs) deemed lewd and inappropriate by the Administrators and Moderators of this board is prohibited.
1st Offense: PERMANENT BAN
I should clarify that the punishments listed above are only used to illustrate what I'm talking about. I'm not necessarily making any recommendations for specific actions to be taken against any member. Another member pointed out to me that a verbal warning on the 1st offense could be useful in a situation where someone has committed a violation without intentionally breaking a rule. That could help to find some common ground in the grey area which is bound to exist even with clear-cut rules.
Something like this would leave little room for members to question disciplinary actions, or to scream "favoritism" when someone is suspended or banned.
I'll use rules #1 and #3 as examples...
(1) Abusive and vulgar language is prohibited. Any attempt to modify the actual word or convey the meaning of such that is deemed inappropriate by the Administrators and Moderators of this board is prohibited.
1st Offense: 5 Day Suspension
2nd Offense: 15 Day Suspension
3rd Offense: PERMANENT BAN
3) Pornography is strictly prohibited. Content (including photographs) deemed lewd and inappropriate by the Administrators and Moderators of this board is prohibited.
1st Offense: PERMANENT BAN
I should clarify that the punishments listed above are only used to illustrate what I'm talking about. I'm not necessarily making any recommendations for specific actions to be taken against any member. Another member pointed out to me that a verbal warning on the 1st offense could be useful in a situation where someone has committed a violation without intentionally breaking a rule. That could help to find some common ground in the grey area which is bound to exist even with clear-cut rules.
Last edited: