Dragon,
Alright here you go. I haven't taken the car to the track yet, so I don't have any times. The car makes 930rwhp/1070rwtq. (Those #'s are decieving because turbos on this big motor are way different than superchargers. Without going on and on about it, a 750rwhp will have a faster ET and higher trap speed than an 850rwhp supercharged car. The torque curve is rediculous.) The video you are trying to find is of a supercharged car that is not comparable to this car. I understand why some folks are doubting. I can see what you guys are talking about not being tucked, but I can tell you with absolute certainly that the bike was right there behind me all the way to around 170-180mph. If he wasn't tucked well enough, then he must have really been feeling the wind, because I am telling you that he was going that fast, no doubt about it, you can take it to the bank!! I didn't get where I am in life by being dishonest. You are saying, "well how the hell can you be so sure what speed you were going?"
I'll break it down for you. In the video I started at 80mph in 3rd. The race started and I shifted to fourth at 6000rpm. I ran that gear out and shifted to fifth at 6000rpm, then I stayed in the throttle for another six seconds or so. So here is the deal. At 6000rpm in 4th gear this is how the #'s work out:
(Copy And Pasted From My Buddy Paolo)
Tire Size
(e.g. 245/50-16) / - 345/25/20
OR
Tire Diameter
(in inches) 26.791338582677166
OR
Revolutions Per Mile
Axle Ratio 3.07
Redline (RPM) 6200
First Gear 2.66
Second Gear 1.78
Third Gear 1.30
Fourth Gear 1
Fifth Gear .74
Sixth Gear .5
4000 39 58 80 104 140 208
4100 40 60 82 106 144 213
4200 41 61 84 109 147 218
4300 42 63 86 112 151 223
4400 43 64 88 114 154 228
4500 44 66 90 117 158 234
4600 45 67 92 119 161 239
4700 46 69 94 122 165 244
4800 47 70 96 125 168 249
4900 48 71 98 127 172 254
5000 49 73 100 130 175 260
5100 50 74 102 132 179 265
5200 51 76 104 135 182 270
5300 52 77 106 138 186 275
5400 53 79 108 140 189 280
5500 54 80 110 143 193 286
5600 55 82 112 145 196 291
5700 56 83 114 148 200 296
5800 57 85 116 151 203 301
5900 58 86 118 153 207 306
6000 59 88 120 156 211 312
6100 60 89 122 158 214 317
6200 61 90 124 161 218 322
If you look at the little chart you will see that Paolo's calculations reflect that the car is going 156mph in 4th gear at 6000rpm. I shift to fifth and stay in the throttle for about six more seconds. How much speed do you think a car at this level will build on top of 156mph after another 5 or 6 seconds of full throttle acceleration. I looked down at the speedo(which is spot on in vipers,I verified mine with my police buddies laser) and the needle was clearly above 170. I am guessing it was more like 180 because by the time I looked down, I had already been out of the throttle for a moment. When I looked back the Bike was still there until the last second or so of acceleration in fifth. Why do I know this? Because that is what made me lift. I didn't want to be the first to lift becuase I didn't want him to come flying past me and then say, "yeah the Busa got ya on the top end just like I knew it would".(Don't we all know folks like that)
The point I am making is the bike DID in fact stay right with me to 170MPH. There is no doubt about it. If you don't believe me then that is on you, but I think this explination should have enough facts in it to convince anyone that is reasonable that at the very least, we were going the speed I claim. Now could the bike rider be inexperienced, and could the bike benifit from a professional tune? Of coarse, but maybe the "half tucked" rider position is just this guy's style, and maybe the bike has a really good "static tune" that puts it where it needs to be. The only thing I knw for sure is that I don't have any excuses for my performance, and we went from 80-175(+/-5mph) in this race.