200 milion dollars a day vacation

[rockethead]

Mr. Obama said his health plan would be “intimately woven into” his administration’s economic blueprint. And he directly confronted those who might ask how the country could afford a major expansion of health coverage in times of shrinking revenues and burgeoning deficits. “I ask a different question,” Mr. Obama said. “I ask how can we afford not to?”

sounds like dodging the question to me... and this is at a rally in vew mexico. in your backyard right schexy? no wonder you won't open your eyes you all are mesmorized by the *cough* great speaker and man they call obama If you are a supporter that's one thing, but show where he has helped anything? did you know in his first couple months in office he tried to make himslef prez for life??? read this Chris Weigant: Obama Declares Himself President-For-Life (No Fooling!)

http://www.faithfreedom.org/obama.html or this one

exerpt from that site:

For twenty years Obama was part of Jeremiah Wright’s racist church and listened to all the hate which that man spewed against the Jews and the “rich White America.” Obama did not object to any of those hateful comments and even donated $20,000 dollars to his Trinity United Church of Christ. Baitz is willing to overlook all that and, mesmerized by Obama’s speeches, he embraces a man who up until yesterday supported the racist views of his spiritual mentor. He calls Obama’s speech "glorious," and concludes he is honest and moral. How did he come to that hasty conclusion? There is no evidence of that except his "gut feeling." That observation is subjective. We have not seen any evidence of Obama's honesty yet. On the contrary, he has been caught with a litany of lies.

Clearly Sen. Obama has a charming effect on his audience, who after listening to him are so moved that they willingly give up their reason and follow their hearts.

 

[Schexy1]

Seriously, I asked for proof of him changing our country to socialism and you give me this? Although intriguing, those articles were filled with opinions and void of any factual evidence. They actually read like campaign propaganda. Yes, you can read those articles and deduct that he is a socialist. But, in order to come to that conclusion, you have to ignore facts. If you compare his actions to both of the Bushes, Clinton, Reagan, Carter, Ford and so on, you will see that they all did similar, if not the same things.

An April fool’s joke is evidence of him trying to be President for Life? Is the speech real or creative journalism? Was it actually delivered by Obama or an actor? Did anyone besides the person writing the article hear the broadcast?

Let me give you a brief description of what would be considered proof of socialism:
Legislation to ban guns.
Legislation to limit corporate profits and seize the excess.
Legislation to seize intellectual property.
Legislation to seize private property.
Legislation to eliminate Miranda and due process.
Legislation to ban private education.
Legislation to create or expand censorship.
Legislation to end term limits for his office.
Legislation to change the structure of the government.
Declare Martial Law, this trumps the constitution. Once Martial law is declared, the Senate, House and Supreme Court members who don't support him or who he doesn’t like gets thrown in jail.

Have he done any of those things? Look at some of them carefully; some of his predecessors have tried some of the things on that list. Can you tell me which of his predecessors should be called socialist?

Now, let me tell you what I have seen since he took office.
He has consistently taken legislation and ideas from Republicans (conservatives) and passed them on as his, Obama Care and the stimulus in particular. Maybe this was done to try to work with the other side or maybe he doesn’t have any ideas of his own. It really doesn’t matter because to you and others like you, the idea doesn’t matter. What matters is who presents it.
In an effort to work together, he has wimped out. He had the opportunity to push everything through on his so-called Socialist Agenda before the beginning of this year. He let that slip away. Does that sound like a man you consider the next Fuhrer?

I like or dislike a person or entity based on what they actually do not political rhetoric. Although some propaganda can seem quite convincing, I seek out the facts and analyze them, you should do the same.

Just to let you know, I don't support Obama or Bush etc., I support the POTUS like an American shouold. Will I vote for him in the next election? Not if there is a more viable choice.

 

[Schexy1]

Wel, i'm waitingl

 

[Rainbow7]

I support the POTUS like an American shouold.

That is a truly retarded attitude. The whole point of your political system is that you are free to express your disagreement with your government.
The "my country, right or wrong" way of thinking is what gives rise to ordinary people committing horrendous acts, all in the name of their country.

 

[Schexy1]

That is a truly retarded attitude. The whole point of your political system is that you are free to express your disagreement with your government.
The "my country, right or wrong" way of thinking is what gives rise to ordinary people committing horrendous acts, all in the name of their country.

So what you are saying is that everytime I disagree with the POTUS or any elected official I should riot? Military members who don't support or believe in the reason for the war should stay at home?

I support the office, not the person or party. There is a difference between not supporting and not agreeing with.