Be afraid... Very afraid.

runeight

why ask why
Donating Member
Registered
I have never been more concerned of what the future holds for all of us. In my opinion we are very close to a Socialized Government and becoming a suburb of France within four years.

I believe this will be one of the most important elections of our time and ask everyone to cast your vote. We are still a Democracy. This is still America.

Senator Reid, Nancy Pelosi, Barack Obama and a Democratic Congress, will bring this Country to it's knees economically in four years.


r8
 
I have never been more concerned of what the future holds for all of us. In my opinion we are very close to a Socialized Government and becoming a suburb of France within four years.

I believe this will be one of the most important elections of our time and ask everyone to cast your vote. We are still a Democracy. This is still America.

Senator Reid, Nancy Pelosi, Barack Obama and a Democratic Congress, will bring this Country to it's knees economically in four years.


r8


I am definitely TERRIFIED ................. of John McCain winning and/or the trickery that the RIGHT may pull to try to win the election !!
 
WASHINGTON — House Speaker Nancy Pelosi paid her husband's real estate and investment firm nearly $100,000 from her political action committee over the past decade, a practice that she voted to ban last year and that her party condemned as part of the "culture of corruption" when Republicans did it.

The Washington Times is reporting that the California Democrat's husband, Paul F. Pelosi, owns Financial Leasing Services Inc., which has received $99,000 in rent, utilities and accounting fees from the speaker's "PAC to the Future" over the PAC's nine-year history.

Last year, Pelosi supported a bill that would have banned members of Congress from putting spouses on their campaign staffs. The bill banned not only direct payments by congressional campaign committees and PACs to spouses for services including consulting and furndraising, but also "indirect compensation," such as payments to companies that employ spouses.

The bill passed the House in a voice vote but died in a Senate committee.

Last week, Pelosi's office defended the payments, saying they were legal because she is compensating her husband at fair market value for the work his firm has performed for the PAC.

Ethical watchdogs called Pelosi's arrangement "problematic."


r8
 
Ties to who?

While Moses served at Fannie Mae and was Frank’s partner, Frank was actively working to support GSEs, according to several news outlets.



In 1991, Frank and former Rep. Joe Kennedy, D-Mass., lobbied for Fannie to soften rules on multi-family home mortgages although those dwellings showed a default rate twice that of single-family homes, according to the Nov. 22, 1991, Boston Globe.



BusinessWeek reported in its Nov. 14, 1994, issue that Fannie Mae called on Frank to exert his influence against a Housing & Urban Development proposal that would force the GSE to focus on minority and low-income buyers and police bias by lenders regardless of their location. Fannie Mae opposed HUD on the issue because it claimed doing so would “ignore the urban middle class.”



Moses left Fannie in 1998 to start his own pottery business. National Mortgage News called Moses a “mortgage guru” and said he developed “many of Fannie Mae's affordable housing and home improvement lending programs. Moses ended his relationship with Frank just months after he left Fannie.



Even after the relationship ended, however, Frank was a staunch defender of Fannie Mae even as other experts suggested there were serious problems building in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.



According to an article by Kathleen Day in the Oct. 8, 2003, Washington Post, Frank opposed giving the Bush administration the right to approve or disapprove business activities that “could pose risk to the taxpayers.” He told the Post he worried the Treasury Department “would sacrifice activities that are good for consumers in the name of lowering the companies’ market risks.”



Just a month before, Frank had aggressively thwarted reform efforts by the Bush administration. He told The New York Times on Sept. 11, 2003, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac’s problems were “exaggerated,” a gross miscalculation some five years later with costs estimated to be in the hundreds of billions.



“These two entities – Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac – are not facing any kind of financial crisis,” Frank said to the Times. “The more people exaggerate these problems, the more pressure there is on these companies, the less we will see in terms of affordable housing.”

Housing was not affordable. ARM's were.



Frank has also reaped campaign contribution benefits from Fannie Mae and its counterpart Freddie Mac. According a front page story in the Sept. 19, 2008, Investor’s Business Daily by Terry Jones, Frank has received $40,100 in campaign cash over the past two decades from the GSEs.


Then the fix? :moon:

Political Punch

r8
 
Last edited:
Frank was asked by CNN’s John Roberts on the Sept. 22, 2008 “American Morning†about this and his opposition to reform Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Originally, he claimed he didn’t think the two GSEs were facing any problems when the issue first surfaced in 2003. He instead blamed the Republican-controlled Congress for their ultimate fall, failing to mention his friendly relationship with Fannie Mae and the contributions it had made to his campaign over the years.



“Yes, I did not think we were facing a crisis in 2003, but that didn't mean we didn't have to have reform,†an animated Frank said when confronted with the question. “Here’s the deal, the Republicans controlled Congress from 1995 through 2006. They did zero to reform Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.â€



However, on Sept. 17, 2008, former Bush administration Deputy Chief of Staff Karl Rove elaborated on the Bush administration’s efforts to curb abuses at the two GSEs in 2003. He told Fox News’ “Hannity & Colmes†that Frank was among the most aggressive opponents of White House attempts to reform Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.



“All of this bad stuff on Wall Street happened because people got greedy and the greed started at Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac,†Rove said. “And I know this because five years ago, the administration was alerted by the regulator, James Lockhart, that there was insufficient authority and that these institutions – particularly Fannie – were out of control.â€



Rove said the Bush administration’s efforts to reform Fannie and Freddie were opposed by congressional Democrats – specifically Frank and Senate Banking Committee Chairman Christopher Dodd, D-Conn.



“And I got to tell you, for five years, I was part of an effort at the White House to fight this and our biggest opponents on the Hill who blocked this every step of the way were people like Chris Dodd and Barney Frank. And Fannie and Freddie are the $200 billion contagion at the center of this.â€


Second largest contributor to Obama campain. Fannie and Freddie.

r8
 
I have to agree that this country, in its present condition, will not be able to endure Obama for four years.

ACORN and the claims of voter fraud should make everyone sit up and take notice and who are they hand in hand with............Obama.

Look at the long list of crooks like Rezko and Ayers and their close ties to Obama then throw in Rev Wright and all of the other questionable people tied to Obama. And the dems want to say Palin has problems. Oh please give me a break.

The Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac melt down and who is in the middle of that..........Obama. Who wanted to regulate them and rang the warning bell of problems coming starting back in 2003? Bush and McCain and other key republicans. Who kept saying there wasn't a problem.........THE DEMOCRATS!

It doesn't take a rocket scientist to understand who has told the truth and who has covered the mess causing the huge meltdown we have today. The Democrats have milked this country to the point it is today.

Wake up guys, Obama is not the answer. If he was his homestate where he has served would not be in such bad shape and on the brink of bankruptcy.
 
But voters face a choice between a Republican Party whose image has been destroyed by its Wall Street allies and a Democratic nominee whose spiritual advisor is Rev. Jeremiah Wright. Whose financial backer is Rezko. The man who provided the money for his first real job was William Ayers. And, now it appears, that the object of his financial largesse and the organization for which he was Illinois general counsel was ACORN, massively implicated in voter fraud, funded, in large part, by Obama's presidential campaign funds.

Are we to elect such a man president? Are we to trust the party of Wall Street with four more years at the till? That is the dilemma that makes this election unstable and unpredictable. May the least worst man win!


Richard Morris


r8
 
The Democrats have milked this country to the point it is today.QUOTE]

There not done yet. Obama's latest plan is throwing money in the wind.

Who in their right mind would take money out of a 401K plan when the Stock Market is down 20% due to a large part of Barney Franks and ACORN pushing for minority/low income loans.

r8
 
Last edited:
Can I still ride my Busa in a socialist country? Good!

I'm still voting for McCAIN.

P.

:whistle:
 
Back
Top