That's true but I think SUZUKI invested their money on wrong things,instead of investing so much on electronics which no die hard biker actualy wants SUZUKI should have spent that money on power.I mean who needs a hill assistant and so much modes in busa.Busa is all about raw power and massive TORQUE and these electronics KILL the USP of busa.The other problem is affordability. If Suzuki wanted to, they could have released the Gen 3 with a lot more top end and meet Euro 5+, but this would have required a much higher state of tune and other componentry, forcing the price range out of reach for the mere mortals. They opted instead for a mild state of tune with low-end and mid-range torque, which makes sense to me. I paid $28k AU for mine - the limit of affordability for me. The fact that Suzuki kept the Gen 3 Hayabusa to its current price point is amazing. The other issue is that unlike in 1999 when it released the Gen 1, Suzuki has since understood the futility of reaching for stratospheric top speed smack downs when much lighter and high-spec'd litre bikes do the job just as well if not better.
So if SUZUKI had launched Gen3 without any additional electronics with more power sales would have been much better without increasing the cost.All we wanted was power in busa not silly electronics.