Actually,if i'm going on a road trip out of town i will wear a helmet.But that's about the only time i wear one.And i do get on the hwy around town without one.Hey T-MOB, evidently you and your Busa never leave the city limits, eh? I mean, who in their right mind would venture out at hwy speeds without at least a helmet on? Caught me a nice big fat sparrow once, right between the eyes.....if it wasn't for my helmet shield, well, I'd probably not be here typing this! Think about it son!
Very well put,i feel the exact same way as you do.I understand the risks but i still CHOOSE to ride the way i do.If it's your time to go,it's your time to go...whether you have full gear on or not!!What you'll find here is a general consesus of where we live and the laws we are required to abide by. For those members that live in states that require helmets are certaintly going to be pro helmet laws because they know no other way. For those that live in states the don't require them, the census may definitely lean toward not.
I've stated this everytime this topic has come up, Generally speaking, bikers in Ohio DO NOT wear helmets. I'll be going to a bike night tonight and I'll bet almost 2/3 are not wearing a lid. Here's the deal though, we as humans are creatures of habits, and some of them are bad ones, but when you're brought up in a manner/state where helmets are not required, and you've seen since being a little kid no helmets, that becomes your idea, your image of motorcycling.
I've been riding for 13 years, 4 bikes, 2 accidents, 1 knee injury, NO helmet. I've become so accustomed to not wearing a helmet that I'm actually uncomfortable on the bike and my surrounding when I have one on. Every time I climb on a bike I know the risk involved, and choose to make those risks in enjoyment of my hobby. There's no sure fire way of surviving a bike accident besides staying of the bike to start with. I understand that it's possible to reduce the possible risk with proper gear, but many a great rider have perished with all the right gear.
So I'm against a helmet law in the same manner that I'm against mandatory seatbelt laws. I don't argue that seatbelts have saved lives, but they've taken lives too. I'm just not pro government telling me how I should live my life.
Just my .02
The Etc... goes on and on..........Now i know many of you STRONGLY disagree with this and are probably calling me stupid,dumb,idiot...etc,
so has food....so has.....well you get the point....and its a risk vs. reward type scenario.... seatbelts have proven to save lives, and with anything, in certain situations they can be detrimental.... not wearing a helmet doesn't even compare to seatbelts....i can't even think of a situation where a helmet would end you when you have an off..... I don't argue that seatbelts have saved lives, but they've taken lives too.
Hey listen up Dude,How about everyone worries about themselves instead of everone else?
If you have the overwealming need to nose about someone else's business, have some kids.
Agree with the laws being out of line. Pretty soon, you'll have to wear all your gear in your car with your seat belt. And then all the passengers. You could use the same logic to create the law. Save lives and tax payer money.+1Against helmet law.
BUT
I am in favor of decreased insurance premiums for those who ride with helmets + gear.
I am for denial of insurance coverage for accidents where the rider was without a helmet and gear.
I am for denial of government financial support for accidents where rider was without helmet and gear.
If you dont want to wear gear fine by me but deal with the consequences of your actions.
Helmet and seatbelt laws are way over the line. When I need additonal parenting done by the government I'll let you know. (and I'm thinking if I do need government parenting I'd elect ppl that don't have such f*cked up kids/families)
+10000!"The most effective way to reduce motorcycle injuries and fatalities is to prevent accidents from occurring. Helmets and helmet laws do not prevent accidents."
Maybe we should concentrate on training as an issue instead of legislating what you have to wear...
You were doing alright until you finished up with your last paragraph. Don't get me wrong. As I stated before I'm a big believer in less government, but I don't believe enforcing what should be a COMMON SENSE helmet law is "####ing on someone's freedom of choice." It's a measure taken to protect people from themselves and for the betterment of society as a whole.But this country is going down the shitter because people have nothing better to do than #### on other peoples freedom of choice. Who else is getting hurt by a cyclist not wearing a helmet...but really who else gets hurt by this (physically)?