Space can not be nothing, it is measureable, we just don't know how to measure it......
DING DING DING DING DING!! Judges?? Yep, that's close enough...
We don't know how to measure it.
My question was more of a "human condition of preceptions" than something with an answer.... how do we respond to things beyond our comprehension. And no, I am not trying to yank any one's chain or waste your time, it is a cool question to determine how you see things. Read on.
This all started in a full moon the other night and me knowing how that affects tides on earth and also knowing people get buggy during full moons and I recently heard there ar more births durring full moons. So, I did a little research to discover how or why the moon affects moods and it was pretty interesting reading how science trys to put knowledge into the gaps where, perhaps, imagination or creativity should go. But that is not good enough. Science must define everything within it's KNOWN confines for it to exist, and therefore space does not. Yet, as most of us seem to be pointing out, space goes against nearly all our KNOWN sciences. There for, it's "existance" must in the form of an UNKNOWN science, thus something COULD exist that WE DON'T KNOW about. We don't know that perhaps space doesn't really consist of intangibles that don't align up with OUR defined sciences. This is inconcievable to us. Yet every day we breath oxygen we can't see, ride in vehicles we have faith in to keep us alive to the next stop, etc and MOST of that can be defined by science but not everything. But we don't think or worry about that stuff, and why would we? We just trust the sun will come up the next day and that the universe will not expand too much before lunch tomorrow, ruining our day.
Many people, including myself started answering the questions with the "knowns": debri, planets, gas, very small rocks etc etc but it wasn't until I climbed out of the box and were able to look at it NOT with in the confines of science, but using my imagination [where I get to create something from nothing] and think maybe space consists of something else... maybe it is all held together by SOMETHING we might define as an emotion: say like love. Maybe this is where many religions define God as Love - maybe Love is an 'element' so to speak, but is impossible for us to detect - that could be like detecting God.
Don't worry, I'm not really going deep into the religious stuff here.
But the fact that I was open my preception reception to a point where I could accept not knowing everything, is the embracing of humanities infancy, and allows me to live a little freer. At least that's how I think.
I agree with Einstien and was shocked when I first discovered his quote - yes, maybe it was out of context for his time but it does say something important otherwise nobody would care what it said:
Imagination is more important than knowledge. -- Albert Einstein
I am glad we have good science and do good stuff with it, but I feel knowledge can NOT exist without imagination, but imagination sure as heck can live without knowledge. I also beleive the absorbtion of knowledge can displace imagination in our brain, or retrain creativity OUT of our brain and therefore it is dangerous. I would prefer to live a life of imagination than live a life absorbing knowledge.
Ok, truth be told, this all stems from me beign disenchanted with my job that is more knowledge-based than imagination based. The question hit me today on the way to lunch today and I rationed it was not so much the the ANSWER to the question that defined who I am, so much as what I was able to ACCEPT as an answer to the question:
Space can not be nothing, it is measureable, we just don't know how to measure it.
That's a very good way to put it. My answer was:
Things exists that I will never know about but they are there. That's enough proof for me to beleive in thier existance at all. I have faith they are there and I refuse to let childish inadiquacies of SCIENCE dictate or confine my being.*
There's no right or wrong answers to the question, just the acceptace of knowing we are capable of admitting there may be more than we know, is really the answer. I think anyway.
It's so good to see knowledge has not bred out imagination yet.
* Any parallels to my personal religious beliefs are strictly coincidental. maybe.
** No m00ses were harmed during the creation of this thread, even the one that bit me sister