Good on ya!!Sunspot, I will agree with you again. I don't "blame" Candice for what happened, however, her own choices led her to that point. It is not fair that his recklessness caused her so much hurt, but there were chances for her to step out and make a decision that could have prevented this.
And for the record, I am in his age catagoryand I think his actions were terribad. I never ride without gear, a passenger will never get on my bike without gear, and no booze pass the lips when I am riding. Just the way it works. It's a set of rules and choices I make. His age is no excuse, the bar is no excuse, the officers actions are no excuse. It's decision he made that put him there. Sad but true.
and now that the dead horse is deader...
Let's see: Intoxicated, three times the speed limit, running from the law, and endangering other people.
Someone please help me understand why I should have any more sympathy for Nick than for someone that walks into a convienence store with a loaded gunThese are criminal actions. Just my $.02I am saddened for the families, the injured rider on the Goldwing, and for the biking enthusiasts that are unreasonably stereotyped because of these insane actions.
Nationwide I would suspect.Graduated motorcycle license, will probably be on the agenda in some state legislation (in the near future).
I heard about a guy on a cruiser in Arizona, cruising along the freeway minding his own business, not doing anything wrong.I didn't see it as you stereotyping people in this age category... well, if I did, then I probably agree, but... I like to remind those in our age category that not "everyone is doing it". There are plenty of examples here of young riders who always wear their gear.
Upon further review, they may come across as "stereotyping", but it's a well deserved one statistically. Sadly I believe I am a minority for gear in this age group. Case in point, I was riding home from work Wednesday. It's 90 degrees outside and I am wearing my leather jacket and gloves, and of course my helmet. Another early twenties guy on a R1 pulled up next to me at a light to get on the freeway. Looks at my gear and laughs at me, says it's too hot for that shid. I just shrug and go when the light goes green. Couple of miles down the freeway, he is two car lengths ahead of me, I see him flinch hard then slow down. As I pass I see where a rock got him in the arm and "we got a bleeder!". Not an extreme example, but I felt vindicated. I wonder if he heard me laughing as I passed....
If it was what I think it is, where you have to start out with a low CC motorcycle for a few years, then you can move up to higher class CC's every year, I would TOTALLY agree with that concept.Graduated motorcycle license, will probably be on the agenda in some state legislation (in the near future).
This incident only proves all of us riders are just as at risk from other riders as we are from every car, truck or bus on the road.As for the course being mandatory... I don't know. I am torn on that. It is amazing the amount you can learn from it. It's required to get on most military bases with a motorcycle. And statistically I think it's proven it's point. But just how much control do I want some yahoo in a government position who has never been on a bike having...