cougar694u
Registered
I did, but my laptop kept flashing "DANGER TO MANIFOLD" while I was doing burnouts up and down the street in the rain.
HeavyB, What part of the tre would you like to discuss?...(heavybusa @ Jan. 29 2007,19:14) Can we discuss what a TRE is
I never said 5th gear was richer did I? So don't put words into my posts buddy, aight.(2busa @ Jan. 30 2007,02:12) CAT says, "So, if you yank the GPS out, and the C31 is set by doing so, you are altering not fuel, but, ignition timing. If you leave the GPS in, feed the ECM the same value as another gear, then the ECM will see it as the aforementioned value and think its in the same gear as the value represents."
I want to know how the 5th map in stock trim has such a richer mixture if you (think you can) alter back to 5th "analog"... GET IT! 6Fx is showing on the dash, 6fx is in lock-down feeding you the (Fuel/Timing) you need to exceed the 186 just in case the sensor happens to fail as if you were WOT at 186 for a few seconds or two. Work your theory back to question the, GPS analog vs. the digital in the ECM.
Are you sure you NOW want the call on the analog 5th or the f-safe 6Fx? Do you now see the 190/400/6 is the code set. You feel 6Fx.
I believe, when the 13.5's were (first) in the hands of the British rags, they disconnected the GPS sensor to exceed the limit.
(2busa @ Jan. 30 2007,14:44) Cougar states: "Knowing how it works on one manufacturer is not knowing how it work on a different manufacturer."
I will now, (repeat again) incorporate the computer to the 3 variables, (ful/spk/comp). I believe the 4th variable (ECM/EFI~ 6Fx'd-Buas and ECU/DFI~(6)Locked-13.5) varies as 'absolute' as the 3 variables to make an internal combustion run, (from one manufacturer to the other), atmospherically speaking.
I (not me, but the books), will pull your theories up from the roots, so the room may view how your theory holds no foundation against the, THE FACTS BETWEEN BOTH BOOKS.
Both books, 'checkmate' your statement, Coug).
Okay, Don had a TRE installed, correct? Do you know, for a fact (as in pulled any trouble codes), beyond the shadow of a doubt, that the ECU was in 'fix to 6'? If you do, I want factual proof that it was in 'fix to 6'; otherwise, state that you have no proof and are only assuming that it was in 'fix to 6'.(2busa @ Jan. 31 2007,02:45) Cougar, those are dyno questions, (I have zero research). The limiter must be incorporated with the GP sensor, since Don states he has achieved 190 plus, (being coded-6fx). No engine load, the rev is past 10.6k. Loaded, you will hit the limiter. Didn't the dyno point out a 10.2 limit? That's what I mean by researching your questions to give the correct answer.
7ys. of dyno time must have pointed out a pattern by now. Meaning, 10.2 stops in 6th, but the engine will rev up to 10.6 in 5th, is the standing theory?
How do you pull 10.6 in 6th? If Don pulled 190 plus in 6th and the tach was past 10.6 and Don says he uses the tre, (sees 6Fx)... the deduction would be, the limiter is disabled triggered by the 6fx'd, (GPS mod). That is the only mod (ECU wise), Don did to the bike. Correct, Don?
2BUSA(2busa @ Jan. 31 2007,12:57) Cut and past this to your replies. Place a (Y) or (N) in parentheses at the end of the sentence. If you want to define the question, c&p the line that describes what the bike's display window reads. TY
I'm confused, are you speaking in literal terms? Do you mean that our in-dash gear indicator shows the gear positions, but stops at gear 5 and doesn't progress to gear 6?(2busa @ Jan. 31 2007,01:51) Meaning, did the mod change the total performance even though you have a perfectly running shift window that clicks a visual 1-N-2-3-4-5-6 or the dash reads 1-N-2-3-4-5-5?