1. Life and the universe exist. We can all agree on this.
yes I can
2. Life and the universe did not always exist. Physicists tell us the universe is expanding, which indicates to many that it originated in a huge explosion. Geologists point out that the radioactivity of rocks is still decaying, which means that those rocks haven’t always been around. There’s no such thing as perpetual motion, so it’s pretty unlikely that the universe has been moving forever.
True, but the matter was always there in some form.
3. Therefore, at some moment thing began to exist. No matter how long it may have taken for the whole universe to be formed, there had to be a moment when nothing became something.
When the matter reorganized.
4. We cannot observe what happened at that moment. No telescope, microscope, space probe, or camera can show us what happened in the beginning. You’d need a time machine to be at the first moment of creation, and even then you might not be able to understand what was going on.
true
5. Therefore, we can hold only beliefs about how life and the universe came to exist. To scientifically prove a statement about how the universe came to be, you’d have to observe that event and duplicate it through experimentation. Since no human being can do either of those, any descriptions of that event are statements of belief. People who don’t like the word “belief†can say “hypothesis†or “theory†or even “just a wild guess†if they are more comfortable with those words.
we can use what we do know to draw a logical conclusion.
6. We can choose to believe that a Creator did not bring thing into existence. Many have made this choice.
there is nothing to support that but pure belief.
7. However, there is no physical evidence that proves the nonexistence of a Creator. Let’s say that a team of Nobel Prize winners examines every inch of the known universe, right down to the smallest atomic particle. They don’t find a Creator-not even His signature on a molecule saying “God was here.†Does that show that a Creator didn’t bring things into being? No. Those researchers could never be sure they had seen everything. There could be smaller particles, unknown galaxies, and other dimensions. More importantly, they couldn’t be sure they’d built a reliable Creator Detector in the first place. Perhaps the Creator is made up of something that can’t be detected by our most sophisticated equipment. That doesn’t mean God doesn’t exist.
It doesnt mean he does either.
8. Therefore, denying the existence of a Creator requires faith that has no scientific basis.
no it simply means you have no evidence to support the idea of a creator.
9. We can choose to believe that a Creator did bring things into existence. Not a bad choice, considering there’s no hard evidence to the contrary.
there is no evidence to support it either.
10. There is physical evidence that can be interpreted to indicate the existence of a Creator. Just look around. From the colorful patterns of a butterfly to a baby’s ability to learn language, things seem designed-not randomly tossed together. That tends to indicate a designer. This physical evidence does not prove to everyone that a Creator brought things into being. But a reasonable person can conclude that this evidence shows a Creator exists. In other words, we can conclude that physical evidence points to the existence, not nonexistence, of a Creator.
no that just shows you dont understand the process.
11. Therefore, believing in a Creator is based on faith and reason. Faith picks up where the physical evidence leaves off. Faith and reason don’t conflict: they support each other. That’s more than can be said for the “no Creator†argument, which relies on faith alone.
Believing in a creator is based on non information, and lack of understanding in how things work leaving you with no answer, so you make one up that conviently fits.
12. Therefore, it is reasonable to believe in a Creator-more reasonable than to state that He doesn’t exist!
maybe for you.
It’s your choice BELIEVE in a Creator or NOT!
True.