Skin Color under the Helmet

Um so religion has no bearing in our governement?[/QUOTE]

To answer this succinctly, it SHOULDN'T have any bearing on our government -- it was never intended to, and the framers of the constitution did so carefully as to avoid religion having any bearing on our government.

In reality, it sadly does, and moreso everyday... I fear seeing to what end that will be.
 
Okay, first of all American law is NOT based on Christianity, or any other religion,
THANK YOU!

I am so glad to know there are other people who realize this, rather than being spoonfed by the zealots and the revisionists.

I made the argument in a political thread somewhere to this extent and had my head chewed off -- until I made a huge post with quotes from the founding fathers as well as some of their contempraries and modern-day historians.  It amused me to watch these people squirm and try to spin it (which they couldn't), but saddens me that some people are so willing to swallow revisionst history and political dogma without pausing to fire up the brain stem and maybe think for themselves.
Um so religion has no bearing in our governement?

Please explain:

Pledge to the flag:
"One Nation Under GOD"

American Dollar:
"In GOD We Trust"

President's pledge upon taking office ( can't spell the proper word): Many mentionings of GOD.
Every one of those is a modern addition to the orignals, whether the pledge, the currency, or otherwise, and were not the product of the ideas that the nation was founded on:

--Pledge of Allegiance--

The pledge of allegiance was originally written in 1892 without any reference to "God".  Several revisions have been made throughout the years, but that one was added in 1954 "thanks" to a campaign by the Knights of Columbus, and is widely regarded to be a result of the "Red Scare" trials courtesy of Senator Joseph McCarthy.

(Interestingly enough the original author, Francis Bellamy, was actually pressured into leaving the church in 1891 -- a year before the Pledge was written -- due to his poltitcal feelings which he openly expressed.)

What follows is Bellamy's own account of some of the thoughts that went through his mind in August, 1892, as he picked the words of his Pledge:

"It began as an intensive communing with salient points of our national history, from the Declaration of Independence onwards; with the makings of the Constitution...with the meaning of the Civil War; with the aspiration of the people...

The true reason for allegiance to the Flag is the 'republic for which it stands.' ...And what does that vast thing, the Republic mean? It is the concise political word for the Nation - the One Nation which the Civil War was fought to prove. To make that One Nation idea clear, we must specify that it is indivisible, as Webster and Lincoln used to repeat in their great speeches. And its future?

Just here arose the temptation of the historic slogan of the French Revolution which meant so much to Jefferson and his friends, 'Liberty, equality, fraternity.' No, that would be too fanciful, too many thousands of years off in realization. But we as a nation do stand square on the doctrine of liberty and justice for all..."


(from http://history.vineyard.net/pledge.htm)

-- Currency --

Same for "In God We Trust" on our currency.  It was first added in the 1860s, after the civil war, mainly on coins.  On coins it has been interrupted however, and has not steadily been on them, and certainly not since the birth of the couintry.  As fat as paper currency goes, I have recently started collecting currency, and those words do not show up on currency until series printed in 1957 (and that was only on Silver Certificates -- Other currencies did not receive the motto until 1964 or later, depending on face value).

-- Presidential Oath of Office --

There are not "many mentionings" of God in the offical Oath of Office for the President.

As spelled out by the Constitution (Article II, Section 1), the Oath Of Office is:

"I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States."

No mention of God at all.  In fact the option to use the phrase "I do solemnly affirm" rather than "swear" is specifically placed there in order to allow those who are atheists, or teir religious beliefs do not allow them to "swear" (such as Quakers, for example), the ability to take office and use the same oath to show their willingness to uphold the law as required by that office.

"So help me God," as we hear in many recitings of the Oath of Office is traditional, as it came after such was added by someone during an inauguration (though who it was seems to be a matter of contention by historians).  However, the same phrase was added to military Oaths of Office only after 1862, so I am inclined to believe it was also a result of the Civil War, much like coinage was.

=====

The fact of the matter is that zealotous Christianity was by and far not practiced in the time of the founding of our nation, certainly not as it is by the Jerry Fallwells and George W's of today.

Historians agree that most (if not all) of the founding fathers were Deists at best, and some (I believe James Madison among them) were outright Atheists.  (George Washington himself, though an attendant of church -- which was a fashionable thing to do at the time, beliefs or not -- is said (and this was backed up by the priest of his parish at the time) to have never received Communion, and indeed, left the services when Communion was offered.)

There are several anecdotes and historical dosuments (notably minutes kept during the Contenintal Congress), where any possible addition of any mention of an official religion or religious stance by the government were resoundingly struck down, and intentionally removed and kept out of any of the documents that this nation is founded on.
I'm sorry, but you are wrong. Christianity and God had very much to do with the founding of this country. You have chosen only a few examples that fit your hatred for George W. Bush.
try this one.
At the Constitutional Convention of 1787, James Madison proposed the plan to divide the central government into three branches. He discovered this model of government from the Perfect Governor, as he read Isaiah 33:22;
If God, Christianity or the Bible had nothing to do with the founding of this country, where did the idea for our court system come from? Don't just jump back at me with your talking points, do some research and then get back with us.



Here is a link where some quotes can be found.


Here are some more.


John Adams and John Hancock:
We Recognize No Sovereign but God, and no King but Jesus! [April 18, 1775]

John Adams:
“ The general principles upon which the Fathers achieved independence were the general principals of Christianity… I will avow that I believed and now believe that those general principles of Christianity are as eternal and immutable as the existence and attributes of God.â€
• “[July 4th] ought to be commemorated as the day of deliverance by solemn acts of devotion to God Almighty.â€
–John Adams in a letter written to Abigail on the day the Declaration was approved by Congress

"We have no government armed with power capable of contending with human passions unbridled by morality and religion. Avarice, ambition, revenge, or gallantry, would break the strongest cords of our Constitution as a whale goes through a net. Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other." --October 11, 1798



<!--EDIT|Kevin Kesler
Reason for Edit: None given...|1117551008 -->
 
Kevin Kessler:

First, Bravo in completely ignoring what I actually said, and going right for things that were completely oblique from what was being discussed.  You have a bright future in politcal punditry.

Now...

I'm sorry, but you are wrong. Christianity and God had very much to do with the founding of this country. You have chosen only a few examples that fit your hatred for George W. Bush.[/QUOTE]

What?  other than offering up George W as an example of someone who was almost scary-religious, exaclty how did he come into this?  Do you know what my political affiliation is or how I voted lately is?  no?  Yeah, didn't think so.  Just because I'm not a card-carrying member and am an avowed Independent, don't go assuming who I do or don't like.

Try to not be such the defensive party-member next time...  you could go far.

=====

Now on to the rebuttal.  this is basically going to be a repost of what I used in my arguments way back when.  I picked three Founding Fathers at random, found quotes uttered by them as well as supporting arguments by their contemporaries, as well as some info from modern historians as well.

I'm going to try and trim it down, but this is gonna be a VERY large post, I'd imagine.  Sorry in advance, and all emphasis mine unless otherwise noted:

 The founders were NOT Christians, and would not have founded the nation as a Christian ideal. Or to let one of their contemporaries tell it:

"The founders of our nation were nearly all Infidels, and that of the presidents who had thus far been elected [Washington; Adams; Jefferson; Madison; Monroe; Adams; Jackson] not a one had professed a belief in Christianity....
"Among all our presidents from Washington downward, not one was a professor of religion, at least not of more than Unitarianism."


-- The Reverend Doctor Bird Wilson, an Episcopal minister in Albany, New York, in a sermon preached in October, 1831, quoted in John E. Remsberg, "Six Historic Americans."

or perhaps a quote by one of the founding fathers themselves?

"As the government of the United States is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion; as it has in itself no character of enmity against the laws, religion or tranquility of Musselmen [Muslims] ... it is declared ... that no pretext arising from religious opinion shall ever product an interruption of the harmony existing between the two countries....
"The United States is not a Christian nation any more than it is a Jewish or a Mohammedan nation."

-- Treaty of Tripoli (1797), carried unanimously by the Senate and signed into law by John Adams

But hey, let's not take one man's first-hand knowledge, or one of the founding fathers themselves for that matter at face value... let's look at three of the Founders, and not just random ones, but say, three of the most famous of them, all of whom were Presidents, shall we?

Regarding Thomas Jefferson: It spite of Christian right attempts to rewrite history to make Jefferson into a Christian, little about his philosophy resembles that of Christianity. Although Jefferson in the Declaration of Independence wrote of the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God, there exists nothing in the Declaration about Christianity.

Although Jefferson believed in a Creator, his concept of it resembled that of the god of deism (the term "Nature's God" was resoundingly used by deists of the time). With his scientific bent, Jefferson sought to organize his thoughts on religion. He rejected the superstitions and mysticism of Christianity and even went so far as to edit the gospels, removing the miracles and mysticism of Jesus (see The Jefferson Bible) leaving only what he deemed the correct moral philosophy of Jesus.

(From http://www.nobeliefs.com/jefferson.htm)

Quotes from Thomas Jefferson:

Where the preamble declares, that coercion is a departure from the plan of the holy author of our religion, an amendment was proposed by inserting "Jesus Christ," so that it would read "A departure from the plan of Jesus Christ, the holy author of our religion;" the insertion was rejected by the great majority, in proof that they meant to comprehend, within the mantle of its protection, the Jew and the Gentile, the Christian and Mohammedan, the Hindoo and Infidel of every denomination.

-Thomas Jefferson, Autobiography, in reference to the Virginia Act for Religious Freedom

I concur with you strictly in your opinion of the comparative merits of atheism and demonism, and really see nothing but the latter in the being worshipped by many who think themselves Christians.

-Thomas Jefferson, letter to Richard Price, Jan. 8, 1789 (Richard Price had written to TJ on Oct. 26. about the harm done by religion and wrote "Would not Society be better without Such religions? Is Atheism less pernicious than Demonism?")

History, I believe, furnishes no example of a priest-ridden people maintaining a free civil government. This marks the lowest grade of ignorance of which their civil as well as religious leaders will always avail themselves for their own purposes.

-Thomas Jefferson to Alexander von Humboldt, Dec. 6, 1813.

Christianity neither is, nor ever was a part of the common law.

-Thomas Jefferson, letter to Dr. Thomas Cooper, February 10, 1814

"No religious reading, instruction or exercise, shall be prescribed or practiced [in the elementary schools] inconsistent with the tenets of any religious sect or denomination."

--Thomas Jefferson: Elementary School Act, 1817. ME 17:425

"The clergy, by getting themselves established by law and ingrafted into the machine of government, have been a very formidable engine against the civil and religious rights of man."

--Thomas Jefferson to Jeremiah Moor, 1800.

"I am for freedom of religion, and against all maneuvers to bring about a legal ascendency of one sect over another."

--Thomas Jefferson to Elbridge Gerry, 1799. ME 10:78

Moving on...

Regarding John Adams:

Adams, quite succinctly, was an avowed Atheist, who had a rather pronounced aversion to religion, particularly that of Christianity and Catholicism. Want proof? Let's go to the quotes!

"The question before the human race is, whether the God of nature shall govern the world by his own laws, or whether priests and kings shall rule it by fictitious miracles?"

-- John Adams, letter to Thomas Jefferson, June 20, 1815

"The United States of America have exhibited, perhaps, the first example of governments erected on the simple principles of nature; and if men are now sufficiently enlightened to disabuse themselves of artifice, imposture, hypocrisy, and superstition, they will consider this event as an era in their history. Although the detail of the formation of the American governments is at present little known or regarded either in Europe or in America, it may hereafter become an object of curiosity. It will never be pretended that any persons employed in that service had interviews with the gods, or were in any degree under the influence of Heaven, more than those at work upon ships or houses, or laboring in merchandise or agriculture; it will forever be acknowledged that these governments were contrived merely by the use of reason and the senses."

-- John Adams, "A Defence of the Constitutions of Government of the United States of America" (1787-88), from Adrienne Koch, ed., The American Enlightenment: The Shaping of the American Experiment and a Free Society (1965) p. 258, quoted from Ed and Michael Buckner, "Quotations that Support the Separation of State and Church"

"Thirteen governments [of the original states] thus founded on the natural authority of the people alone, without a pretence of miracle or mystery, and which are destined to spread over the northern part of that whole quarter of the globe, are a great point gained in favor of the rights of mankind."

-- John Adams, "A Defence of the Constitutions of Government of the United States of America" (1787-88), from Adrienne Koch, ed., The American Enlightenment: The Shaping of the American Experiment and a Free Society (1965) p. 258, quoted from Ed and Michael Buckner, "Quotations that Support the Separation of State and Church"

"As I understand the Christian religion, it was, and is, a revelation. But how has it happened that millions of fables, tales, legends, have been blended with both Jewish and Christian revelation that have made them the most bloody religion that ever existed?"

-- John Adams, letter to F.A. Van der Kamp, December 27, 1816

"I do not like the reappearance of the Jesuits.... Shall we not have regular swarms of them here, in as many disguises as only a king of the gipsies can assume, dressed as printers, publishers, writers and schoolmasters? If ever there was a body of men who merited damnation on earth and in Hell, it is this society of Loyola's. Nevertheless, we are compelled by our system of religious toleration to offer them an asylum."

-- John Adams, letter to Thomas Jefferson, May 5, 1816

"The priesthood have, in all ancient nations, nearly monopolized learning.... And, even since the Reformation, when or where has existed a Protestant or dissenting sect who would tolerate A FREE INQUIRY? The blackest billingsgate, the most ungentlemanly insolence, the most yahooish brutality is patiently endured, countenanced, propagated, and applauded. But touch a solemn truth in collision with a dogma of a sect, though capable of the clearest proof, and you will soon find you have disturbed a nest, and the hornets will swarm about your legs and hands, and fly into your face and eyes."

-- John Adams, letter to John Taylor, 1814, quoted in Norman Cousins, In God We Trust: The Religious Beliefs and Ideas of the American Founding Fathers (1958), p. 108, quoted from James A. Haught, ed., 2000 Years of Disbelief

"God is an essence that we know nothing of. Until this awful blasphemy is got rid of, there never will be any liberal science in the world."

-- John Adams, "this awful blashpemy" that he refers to is the myth of the Incarnation of Christ.  From Ira D. Cardiff, What Great Men Think of Religion, quoted from James A. Haught, ed., 2000 Years of Disbelief

"Numberless have been the systems of iniquity The most refined, sublime, extensive, and astonishing constitution of policy that ever was conceived by the mind of man was framed by the Romish clergy for the aggrandizement of their own Order They even persuaded mankind to believe, faithfully and undoubtingly, that God Almighty had entrusted them with the keys of heaven, whose gates they might open and close at pleasure ... with authority to license all sorts of sins and Crimes ... or withholding the rain of heaven and the beams of the sun; with the management of earthquakes, pestilence, and famine; nay, with the mysterious, awful, incomprehensible power of creating out of bread and wine the flesh and blood of God himself. All these opinions they were enabled to spread and rivet among the people by reducing their minds to a state of sordid ignorance and staring timidity, and by infusing into them a religious horror of letters and knowledge. Thus was human nature chained fast for ages in a cruel, shameful, and deplorable servitude....
Of all the nonsense and delusion which had ever passed through the mind of man, none had ever been more extravagant than the notions of absolutions, indelible characters, uninterrupted successions, and the rest of those fantastical ideas, derived from the canon law, which had thrown such a glare of mystery, sanctity, reverence, and right reverend eminence and holiness around the idea of a priest as no mortal could deserve ... the ridiculous fancies of sanctified effluvia from episcopal fingers."

-- John Adams, "A Dissertation on the Canon and the Feudal Law," printed in the Boston Gazette, August 1765

And finally...

Regarding George Washington:

Before I go into Washington directly, I will first address what I find to be a nauseatingly blatant attempt by the Christian "Right" to try and manipulate and undermine Washington's words to match what they want. I don't mean just taking quotes out of context, but actually, intentionally, misquoting and putting words in his mouth. I speak primarily of what is referred to as "Washington's Prayer".

The alleged Prayer goes thusly:

"Almighty God, we make our earnest prayer that Thou wilt keep these United States in Thy holy protection, that Thou wilt incline the hearts of the citizens to cultivate a spirit of subordination and obedience to government; to entertain a brotherly affection and love for one another, and for their fellow citizens of the United States at large. And finally that Thou wilt most graciously be pleased to dispose us all to do justice, to love mercy and to demean ourselves with that charity, humility and pacific temper of mind which were the characteristics of the Divine Author of our blessed religion, and without an humble imitation of Whose example in these things we can never hope to be a happy nation. Grant our supplication, we beseech Thee, through Jesus Christ our Lord. Amen.

-- Engraved on a bronze tablet in St. Paul's Chapel, Broadway and Vesey Streets, New York City, quoted from Franklin Steiner, The Religious Beliefs of Our Presidents, pp. 19-20

Washington never uttered those words... they are, essentially a lie.

The ACTUAL Statement Washington made in a dispatch of official business (Please note -- it WAS NOT a prayer):

"I now make it my earnest prayer, that Nature's God would have you, and the state over which you preside, in his holy protection; that he would incline the hearts of the citizens to cultivate a spirit of subordination and obedience to government, to entertain a brotherly affection and love for one another, for their fellow-citizens of the United States at large, and particularly for their brethren who have served in the field; and finally, that he would most graciously be pleased to dispose us all to justice, to love mercy, and to demean ourselves with that charity, humility and pacific temper of mind which were the characteristics of the Divine Author of our blessed religion, and without an humble imitation of whose examples in these things, we can never hope to be a happy nation.
I have the honor to be, with much esteem and respect, sir, your Excellency's most obedient and most humble servant. -- G. Washington."


-- George Washington, letter sent to the governors in 1783, urging them to quell anarchy and riots by alleviating distress and discontent, quoted from Ford's Writings of Washington, vol. x, p. 265, also quoted from Franklin Steiner, The Religious Beliefs of Our Presidents, pp. 19-20

No mention of Jesus Christ in here at all. And the reference to God is in reference tothat as a Deist, not as a Christian... his status as a Deist is backed up by many of his contemporaries and biographers of the time, before the Religious Right tried to take him as their own.

Now that that is out of the way:

Although raised in the church of England, by the time Washington became his famous role of leader, general, and President, he was far less a Christian and more a Deist.

Washington was not a communicant. This fact can be easily demonstrated. A century ago it was the custom of all classes, irrespective of their religious beliefs, to attend church. Washington, adhering to the custom, attended. But when the administration of the sacrament took place, instead of remaining and partaking of the Lord's Supper as a communicant would have done, he invariably arose and retired from the church.
The closing years of his life, save the last two, were passed in Philadelphia, he being then President of the United States. In addition to his eight years' incumbency of the presidency, he was, during the eight years of the Revolutionary war, and also during the six years that elapsed between the Revolution and the establishment of the Federal government, not only a frequent visitor in Philadelphia, but during a considerable portion of the time a resident of that city. While there he attended the Episcopal churches of which the Rev. William White and the Rev. James Abercromble were rectors. In regard to his being a communicant, no evidence can be so pertinent or so decisive as that of his pastors.

Bishop White, the father of the Protestant Episcopal church of America, is one of the most eminent names in church history. During a large portion of the period covering nearly a quarter of a century, Washington, with his wife, attended the churches in which Bishop White officiated. In a letter dated Fredericksburg, Aug. 13, 1835, Colonel Mercer sent Bishop White the following inquiry relative to this question:

"I have a desire, my dear Sir, to know whether Gen. Washington was a communicant of the Protestant Episcopal church, or whether he occasionally went to the communion only, or if ever he did so at all. ... No authority can be so authentic and complete as yours on this point."

To this inquiry Bishop White replied as follows:

"Philadelphia, Aug. 15, 1835.

"Dear Sir: In regard to the subject of your inquiry, truth requires me to say that Gen. Washington never received the communion in the churches of which I am the parochial minister. Mrs. Washington was an habitual communicant.

... I have been written to by many on that point, and have been obliged to answer them as I now do you. I am respectfully.

"Your humble servant,

"WILLIAM WHITE."

(Memoir of Bishop White, pp. 196, 197).

In the political documents, correspondence, and other writings of Washington, few references to the prevailing religion of his day are found. In no instance has he expressed a disbelief in the Christian religion, neither can there be found in all his writings a single sentence that can with propriety be construed into an acknowledgment of its claims. Once or twice he refers to it in complimentary terms, but in these compliments there is nothing inconsistent with the conduct of a conscientious Deist. Religions, like their adherents, possess both good and bad qualities, and Christianity is no exception. While there is much in it deserving the strongest condemnation, there is also much that commands the respect and even challenges the admiration of Infidels. Occupying the position that Washington did, enjoying as he did the confidence and support of Christians, it was not unnatural that he should indulge in a few friendly allusions to their religious faith.

In his "Farewell Address," the last and best political paper he gave to the Christian religion is not once named. In this work he manifests the fondest solicitude for the future of his country. His sentences are crowded with words of warning and fatherly advice. But he does not seem to be impressed with the idea that the safety of the government or the happiness of the people depends upon Christianity. He recommends a cultivation of the religious sentiment, but evinces no partiality for the popular faith.

"I am persuaded, you will permit me to observe that the path of true piety is so plain as to require but little political direction. To this consideration we ought to ascribe the absence of any regulation, respecting religion, from the Magna-Charta of our country."

-- George Washington, responding to a group of clergymen who complained that the Constitution lacked mention of Jesus Christ, in 1789, Papers, Presidential Series, 4:274, the "Magna-Charta" here refers to the proposed United States Constitution

"Of all the animosities which have existed among mankind, those which are caused by a difference of sentiments in religion appear to be the most inveterate and distressing, and ought to be deprecated. I was in hopes that the enlightened and liberal policy, which has marked the present age, would at least have reconciled Christians of every denomination so far that we should never again see the religious disputes carried to such a pitch as to endanger the peace of society."

-- George Washington, letter to Edward Newenham, October 20, 1792, quoted from Albert J. Menendez and Edd Doerr, The Great Quotations on Religious Freedom, also James A. Haught, 2000 Years of Disbelief

"We have abundant reason to rejoice that in this Land the light of truth and reason has triumphed over the power of bigotry and superstition ... In this enlightened Age and in this Land of equal liberty it is our boast, that a man's religious tenets will not forfeit the protection of the Laws, nor deprive him of the right of attaining and holding the highest Offices that are known in the United States."

-- George Washington, letter to the members of the New Church in Baltimore, January 27, 1793, in Anson Phelps Stokes, Church and State in the United States, Vol 1. p. 497, quoted from Albert J. Menendez and Edd Doerr, The Great Quotations on Religious Freedom

"If they are good workmen, they may be of Asia, Africa, or Europe. They may be Mohometans, Jews or Christians of any Sect, or they may be Atheists."

-- George Washington, letter to Tench Tilghman asking him to secure a carpenter and a bricklayer for his Mount Vernon estate, March 24, 1784, in Paul F. Boller, George Washington & Religion (1963) p. 118, quoted from Ed and Michael Buckner, "Quotations that Support the Separation of State and Church"

Quotes About Washington and Religion/Christianity:

"[Washington was] a total stranger to religious prejudices, which have so often excited Christians of one denomination to cut the throats of those of another."

-- John Bell, in 1779, in Paul F. Boller, George Washington & Religion, Dallas: Southern Methodist University Press, 1963, p. 118, quoted from Ed and Michael Buckner, "Quotations that Support the Separation of State and Church"

""Dr. Rush told me (he had it from Asa Green) that when the clergy addressed General Washington, on his departure from the government, it was observed in their consultation that he had never, on any occasion, said a word to the public which showed a belief in the Christian religion, and they thought they should so pen their address as to force him at length to disclose publicly whether he was a Christian or not. However, he observed, the old fox was too cunning for them. He answered every article of their address particularly, except that, which he passed over without notice."

-- Thomas Jefferson, quoted from Jefferson's Works, Vol. iv., p. 572. (Asa Green "was probably the Reverend Ashbel Green, who was chaplain to congress during Washington's administration." -- Farrell Till in "The Christian Nation Myth.")

"I know that Gouverneur Morris, who claimed to be in his secrets, and believed himself to be so, has often told me that General Washington believed no more in that system [Christianity] than he did."

-- Thomas Jefferson, in his private journal, February, 1800, quoted from Jefferson's Works, Vol. iv., p. 572 ("Gouverneur Morris was the principal drafter of the Constitution of the United States; he was a member of the Continental Congress, a United States senator from New York, and minister to France. He accepted, to a considerable extent, the skeptical views of French Freethinkers." -- John E. Remsberg, Six Historic Americans.)

"Sir, Washington was a Deist."

-- The Reverend Doctor James Abercrombie, rector of the church Washington had attended with his wife, to The Reverend Bird Wilson, an Episcopal minister in Albany, New York, upon Wilson's having inquired of Abercrombie regarding Washington's religious beliefs, quoted from John E. Remsberg, Six Historic Americans

"The pictures that represent him on his knees in the winter forest at Valley Forge are even silly caricatures. Washington was at least not sentimental, and he had nothing about him of the Pharisee that displays his religion at street corners or out in the woods in the sight of observers, or where his portrait could be taken by 'our special artist'!"

-- The Reverend M. J. Savage, quoted from Franklin Steiner, The Religious Beliefs of Our Presidents, p. 22

""I have diligently perused every line that Washington ever gave to the public, and I do not find one expression in which he pledges, himself as a believer in Christianity. I think anyone who will candidly do as I have done, will come to the conclusion that he was a Deist and nothing more."

-- The Reverend Bird Wilson, an Episcopal minister in Albany, New York, in an interview with Mr. Robert Dale Owen written on November 13, 1831, which was publlshed in New York two weeks later, quoted from Franklin Steiner, The Religious Beliefs of Our Presidents, pp. 27

"[/b]On communion Sundays, he left the church with me after the blessing [before the sacrament], and returned home,[/b] and we sent the carriage back after my grandmother."

-- George Custis, letter to Mr. Sparks on February 26, 1833, in Sparks's Washington, p. 521, quoted from Franklin Steiner, The Religious Beliefs of Our Presidents, pp. 29

"Unlike Thomas Jefferson -- and Thomas Paine, for that matter -- Washington never even got around to recording his belief that Christ was a great ethical teacher. His reticence on the subject was truly remarkable. Washington frequently alluded to Providence in his private correspondence. But the name of Christ, in any correspondence whatsoever, does not appear anywhere in his many letters to friends and associates throughout his life."

-- Paul F. Boller, George Washington & Religion (1963) pp. 74-75, quoted from Ed and Michael Buckner, "Quotations that Support the Separation of State and Church."

"George Washington's conduct convinced most Americans that he was a good Christian, but those possessing first-hand knowledge of his religious convictions had reasons for doubt."

-- Barry Schwartz, George Washington: The Making of an American Symbol (1987) p. 170, quoted from Ed and Michael Buckner, "Quotations that Support the Separation of State and Church"


So in closing, someone who asks something like "you mean to tell me a bunch of Christians who founded this country did not use a lot of Christianity influence to set up laws and governments?" is asking a fallacious question... because the country was not founded by Christians nor did it use Christian influence in the first place. This is just another myth being disseminated by the Religious Intolerants who wish to make this nation as fundamentalist as the Muslim ones they decry.

And one could argue, as it goes against the actual ideals and intentions of the Framers, to say it is could even be.... Un-American...
smile.gif


(Debating with the son of a Political Historian sucks, don't it?
wink.gif
)
 
All I did was post one stupid article from Yahoo's news. But just to update you all. Went riding today with some fellow board members here in L.A. Stopped at the Dear Lodge in Ojai California. Predominantely white Harley owners. Rest of the riders from the board with me didn't notice because it wasn't them being stared down like they didn't belong there. Funny thing is we ALL rode up in Busas, but guess who got th stares like I shouldn't be there? Your's truly, the skinny Asian guy that they may have mistaken for deliverying chinese fast food there? Perhaps there to fix their computer system? Some bald, harley tough assh*le wanna be even try to punk me out of me place in line for the guys' restroom. Gave me that same death look as after I came out with clean hands ready to eat lunch. Me No F*cking care.

Some of you guys still in denial that racism is a thing of the past, or that whenever someone mentions it, they're just "crying wolf". Yes, this happened on this fine day in Southern California May 30th, 2005 at approximately 2:30 pm PST.

Now I don't care who I ride with, as long as they can teach me how to develope my Newbie skills. I don't care who I wave to on a bike as long as they wave back. I don't care who I drink with and shoot the crap with as long as they don't harbor this look like I killed their father in some Bamboo jungle.

Simple as that.

Each and everyone of you. Take out your license. Does it say anywhere on it that your white, black, asian, mexican, native american indian? Don't know about the rest of the states, but mine don't. Mine saids M1, as in the right to operate a two wheel motorbike on public roads. Some of you in some state may have a MC instead. Guess what, that's part of you. Just like your eye color, your weight, you height. Whether you like it or not, you and my chinky ass (that's right I can call myself that, cause I've been called enough of it behind my back in my life already) have that in common. Just like you have that in common with every other rider out there that has a M1 or MC on their license regardless if they're red, black, white, yellow, or brown.

Now just stop denying that there is still racial discrimination just because you don't actively practice it yourself. Accept that if we cannot be unity by anything else in this life, we should be unity by the commonality of the 2 wheel, or if you want to be be even more discriminate, by a busa.
 
Kevin Kessler:

First, Bravo in completely ignoring what I actually said, and going right for things that were completely oblique from what was being discussed.  You have a bright future in politcal punditry.

Now...

I'm sorry, but you are wrong. Christianity and God had very much to do with the founding of this country. You have chosen only a few examples that fit your hatred for George W. Bush.

What?  other than offering up George W as an example of someone who was almost scary-religious, exaclty how did he come into this?  Do you know what my political affiliation is or how I voted lately is?  no?  Yeah, didn't think so.  Just because I'm not a card-carrying member and am an avowed Independent, don't go assuming who I do or don't like.

Try to not be such the defensive party-member next time...  you could go far.

=====

Now on to the rebuttal.  this is basically going to be a repost of what I used in my arguments way back when.  I picked three Founding Fathers at random, found quotes uttered by them as well as supporting arguments by their contemporaries, as well as some info from modern historians as well.

I'm going to try and trim it down, but this is gonna be a VERY large post, I'd imagine.  Sorry in advance, and all emphasis mine unless otherwise noted:

 The founders were NOT Christians, and would not have founded the nation as a Christian ideal. Or to let one of their contemporaries tell it:

"The founders of our nation were nearly all Infidels, and that of the presidents who had thus far been elected [Washington; Adams; Jefferson; Madison; Monroe; Adams; Jackson] not a one had professed a belief in Christianity....
"Among all our presidents from Washington downward, not one was a professor of religion, at least not of more than Unitarianism."


-- The Reverend Doctor Bird Wilson, an Episcopal minister in Albany, New York, in a sermon preached in October, 1831, quoted in John E. Remsberg, "Six Historic Americans."

or perhaps a quote by one of the founding fathers themselves?

"As the government of the United States is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion; as it has in itself no character of enmity against the laws, religion or tranquility of Musselmen [Muslims] ... it is declared ... that no pretext arising from religious opinion shall ever product an interruption of the harmony existing between the two countries....
"The United States is not a Christian nation any more than it is a Jewish or a Mohammedan nation."

-- Treaty of Tripoli (1797), carried unanimously by the Senate and signed into law by John Adams

But hey, let's not take one man's first-hand knowledge, or one of the founding fathers themselves for that matter at face value... let's look at three of the Founders, and not just random ones, but say, three of the most famous of them, all of whom were Presidents, shall we?

Regarding Thomas Jefferson: It spite of Christian right attempts to rewrite history to make Jefferson into a Christian, little about his philosophy resembles that of Christianity. Although Jefferson in the Declaration of Independence wrote of the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God, there exists nothing in the Declaration about Christianity.

Although Jefferson believed in a Creator, his concept of it resembled that of the god of deism (the term "Nature's God" was resoundingly used by deists of the time). With his scientific bent, Jefferson sought to organize his thoughts on religion. He rejected the superstitions and mysticism of Christianity and even went so far as to edit the gospels, removing the miracles and mysticism of Jesus (see The Jefferson Bible) leaving only what he deemed the correct moral philosophy of Jesus.

(From http://www.nobeliefs.com/jefferson.htm)

Quotes from Thomas Jefferson:

Where the preamble declares, that coercion is a departure from the plan of the holy author of our religion, an amendment was proposed by inserting "Jesus Christ," so that it would read "A departure from the plan of Jesus Christ, the holy author of our religion;" the insertion was rejected by the great majority, in proof that they meant to comprehend, within the mantle of its protection, the Jew and the Gentile, the Christian and Mohammedan, the Hindoo and Infidel of every denomination.

-Thomas Jefferson, Autobiography, in reference to the Virginia Act for Religious Freedom

I concur with you strictly in your opinion of the comparative merits of atheism and demonism, and really see nothing but the latter in the being worshipped by many who think themselves Christians.

-Thomas Jefferson, letter to Richard Price, Jan. 8, 1789 (Richard Price had written to TJ on Oct. 26. about the harm done by religion and wrote "Would not Society be better without Such religions? Is Atheism less pernicious than Demonism?")

History, I believe, furnishes no example of a priest-ridden people maintaining a free civil government. This marks the lowest grade of ignorance of which their civil as well as religious leaders will always avail themselves for their own purposes.

-Thomas Jefferson to Alexander von Humboldt, Dec. 6, 1813.

Christianity neither is, nor ever was a part of the common law.

-Thomas Jefferson, letter to Dr. Thomas Cooper, February 10, 1814

"No religious reading, instruction or exercise, shall be prescribed or practiced [in the elementary schools] inconsistent with the tenets of any religious sect or denomination."

--Thomas Jefferson: Elementary School Act, 1817. ME 17:425

"The clergy, by getting themselves established by law and ingrafted into the machine of government, have been a very formidable engine against the civil and religious rights of man."

--Thomas Jefferson to Jeremiah Moor, 1800.

"I am for freedom of religion, and against all maneuvers to bring about a legal ascendency of one sect over another."

--Thomas Jefferson to Elbridge Gerry, 1799. ME 10:78

Moving on...

Regarding John Adams:

Adams, quite succinctly, was an avowed Atheist, who had a rather pronounced aversion to religion, particularly that of Christianity and Catholicism. Want proof? Let's go to the quotes!

"The question before the human race is, whether the God of nature shall govern the world by his own laws, or whether priests and kings shall rule it by fictitious miracles?"

-- John Adams, letter to Thomas Jefferson, June 20, 1815

"The United States of America have exhibited, perhaps, the first example of governments erected on the simple principles of nature; and if men are now sufficiently enlightened to disabuse themselves of artifice, imposture, hypocrisy, and superstition, they will consider this event as an era in their history. Although the detail of the formation of the American governments is at present little known or regarded either in Europe or in America, it may hereafter become an object of curiosity. It will never be pretended that any persons employed in that service had interviews with the gods, or were in any degree under the influence of Heaven, more than those at work upon ships or houses, or laboring in merchandise or agriculture; it will forever be acknowledged that these governments were contrived merely by the use of reason and the senses."

-- John Adams, "A Defence of the Constitutions of Government of the United States of America" (1787-88), from Adrienne Koch, ed., The American Enlightenment: The Shaping of the American Experiment and a Free Society (1965) p. 258, quoted from Ed and Michael Buckner, "Quotations that Support the Separation of State and Church"

"Thirteen governments [of the original states] thus founded on the natural authority of the people alone, without a pretence of miracle or mystery, and which are destined to spread over the northern part of that whole quarter of the globe, are a great point gained in favor of the rights of mankind."

-- John Adams, "A Defence of the Constitutions of Government of the United States of America" (1787-88), from Adrienne Koch, ed., The American Enlightenment: The Shaping of the American Experiment and a Free Society (1965) p. 258, quoted from Ed and Michael Buckner, "Quotations that Support the Separation of State and Church"

"As I understand the Christian religion, it was, and is, a revelation. But how has it happened that millions of fables, tales, legends, have been blended with both Jewish and Christian revelation that have made them the most bloody religion that ever existed?"

-- John Adams, letter to F.A. Van der Kamp, December 27, 1816

"I do not like the reappearance of the Jesuits.... Shall we not have regular swarms of them here, in as many disguises as only a king of the gipsies can assume, dressed as printers, publishers, writers and schoolmasters? If ever there was a body of men who merited damnation on earth and in Hell, it is this society of Loyola's. Nevertheless, we are compelled by our system of religious toleration to offer them an asylum."

-- John Adams, letter to Thomas Jefferson, May 5, 1816

"The priesthood have, in all ancient nations, nearly monopolized learning.... And, even since the Reformation, when or where has existed a Protestant or dissenting sect who would tolerate A FREE INQUIRY? The blackest billingsgate, the most ungentlemanly insolence, the most yahooish brutality is patiently endured, countenanced, propagated, and applauded. But touch a solemn truth in collision with a dogma of a sect, though capable of the clearest proof, and you will soon find you have disturbed a nest, and the hornets will swarm about your legs and hands, and fly into your face and eyes."

-- John Adams, letter to John Taylor, 1814, quoted in Norman Cousins, In God We Trust: The Religious Beliefs and Ideas of the American Founding Fathers (1958), p. 108, quoted from James A. Haught, ed., 2000 Years of Disbelief

"God is an essence that we know nothing of. Until this awful blasphemy is got rid of, there never will be any liberal science in the world."

-- John Adams, "this awful blashpemy" that he refers to is the myth of the Incarnation of Christ.  From Ira D. Cardiff, What Great Men Think of Religion, quoted from James A. Haught, ed., 2000 Years of Disbelief

"Numberless have been the systems of iniquity The most refined, sublime, extensive, and astonishing constitution of policy that ever was conceived by the mind of man was framed by the Romish clergy for the aggrandizement of their own Order They even persuaded mankind to believe, faithfully and undoubtingly, that God Almighty had entrusted them with the keys of heaven, whose gates they might open and close at pleasure ... with authority to license all sorts of sins and Crimes ... or withholding the rain of heaven and the beams of the sun; with the management of earthquakes, pestilence, and famine; nay, with the mysterious, awful, incomprehensible power of creating out of bread and wine the flesh and blood of God himself. All these opinions they were enabled to spread and rivet among the people by reducing their minds to a state of sordid ignorance and staring timidity, and by infusing into them a religious horror of letters and knowledge. Thus was human nature chained fast for ages in a cruel, shameful, and deplorable servitude....
Of all the nonsense and delusion which had ever passed through the mind of man, none had ever been more extravagant than the notions of absolutions, indelible characters, uninterrupted successions, and the rest of those fantastical ideas, derived from the canon law, which had thrown such a glare of mystery, sanctity, reverence, and right reverend eminence and holiness around the idea of a priest as no mortal could deserve ... the ridiculous fancies of sanctified effluvia from episcopal fingers."

-- John Adams, "A Dissertation on the Canon and the Feudal Law," printed in the Boston Gazette, August 1765

And finally...

Regarding George Washington:

Before I go into Washington directly, I will first address what I find to be a nauseatingly blatant attempt by the Christian "Right" to try and manipulate and undermine Washington's words to match what they want. I don't mean just taking quotes out of context, but actually, intentionally, misquoting and putting words in his mouth. I speak primarily of what is referred to as "Washington's Prayer".

The alleged Prayer goes thusly:

"Almighty God, we make our earnest prayer that Thou wilt keep these United States in Thy holy protection, that Thou wilt incline the hearts of the citizens to cultivate a spirit of subordination and obedience to government; to entertain a brotherly affection and love for one another, and for their fellow citizens of the United States at large. And finally that Thou wilt most graciously be pleased to dispose us all to do justice, to love mercy and to demean ourselves with that charity, humility and pacific temper of mind which were the characteristics of the Divine Author of our blessed religion, and without an humble imitation of Whose example in these things we can never hope to be a happy nation. Grant our supplication, we beseech Thee, through Jesus Christ our Lord. Amen.

-- Engraved on a bronze tablet in St. Paul's Chapel, Broadway and Vesey Streets, New York City, quoted from Franklin Steiner, The Religious Beliefs of Our Presidents, pp. 19-20

Washington never uttered those words... they are, essentially a lie.

The ACTUAL Statement Washington made in a dispatch of official business (Please note -- it WAS NOT a prayer):

"I now make it my earnest prayer, that Nature's God would have you, and the state over which you preside, in his holy protection; that he would incline the hearts of the citizens to cultivate a spirit of subordination and obedience to government, to entertain a brotherly affection and love for one another, for their fellow-citizens of the United States at large, and particularly for their brethren who have served in the field; and finally, that he would most graciously be pleased to dispose us all to justice, to love mercy, and to demean ourselves with that charity, humility and pacific temper of mind which were the characteristics of the Divine Author of our blessed religion, and without an humble imitation of whose examples in these things, we can never hope to be a happy nation.
I have the honor to be, with much esteem and respect, sir, your Excellency's most obedient and most humble servant. -- G. Washington."


-- George Washington, letter sent to the governors in 1783, urging them to quell anarchy and riots by alleviating distress and discontent, quoted from Ford's Writings of Washington, vol. x, p. 265, also quoted from Franklin Steiner, The Religious Beliefs of Our Presidents, pp. 19-20

No mention of Jesus Christ in here at all. And the reference to God is in reference tothat as a Deist, not as a Christian... his status as a Deist is backed up by many of his contemporaries and biographers of the time, before the Religious Right tried to take him as their own.

Now that that is out of the way:

Although raised in the church of England, by the time Washington became his famous role of leader, general, and President, he was far less a Christian and more a Deist.

Washington was not a communicant. This fact can be easily demonstrated. A century ago it was the custom of all classes, irrespective of their religious beliefs, to attend church. Washington, adhering to the custom, attended. But when the administration of the sacrament took place, instead of remaining and partaking of the Lord's Supper as a communicant would have done, he invariably arose and retired from the church.
The closing years of his life, save the last two, were passed in Philadelphia, he being then President of the United States. In addition to his eight years' incumbency of the presidency, he was, during the eight years of the Revolutionary war, and also during the six years that elapsed between the Revolution and the establishment of the Federal government, not only a frequent visitor in Philadelphia, but during a considerable portion of the time a resident of that city. While there he attended the Episcopal churches of which the Rev. William White and the Rev. James Abercromble were rectors. In regard to his being a communicant, no evidence can be so pertinent or so decisive as that of his pastors.

Bishop White, the father of the Protestant Episcopal church of America, is one of the most eminent names in church history. During a large portion of the period covering nearly a quarter of a century, Washington, with his wife, attended the churches in which Bishop White officiated. In a letter dated Fredericksburg, Aug. 13, 1835, Colonel Mercer sent Bishop White the following inquiry relative to this question:

"I have a desire, my dear Sir, to know whether Gen. Washington was a communicant of the Protestant Episcopal church, or whether he occasionally went to the communion only, or if ever he did so at all. ... No authority can be so authentic and complete as yours on this point."

To this inquiry Bishop White replied as follows:

"Philadelphia, Aug. 15, 1835.

"Dear Sir: In regard to the subject of your inquiry, truth requires me to say that Gen. Washington never received the communion in the churches of which I am the parochial minister. Mrs. Washington was an habitual communicant.

... I have been written to by many on that point, and have been obliged to answer them as I now do you. I am respectfully.

"Your humble servant,

"WILLIAM WHITE."

(Memoir of Bishop White, pp. 196, 197).

In the political documents, correspondence, and other writings of Washington, few references to the prevailing religion of his day are found. In no instance has he expressed a disbelief in the Christian religion, neither can there be found in all his writings a single sentence that can with propriety be construed into an acknowledgment of its claims. Once or twice he refers to it in complimentary terms, but in these compliments there is nothing inconsistent with the conduct of a conscientious Deist. Religions, like their adherents, possess both good and bad qualities, and Christianity is no exception. While there is much in it deserving the strongest condemnation, there is also much that commands the respect and even challenges the admiration of Infidels. Occupying the position that Washington did, enjoying as he did the confidence and support of Christians, it was not unnatural that he should indulge in a few friendly allusions to their religious faith.

In his "Farewell Address," the last and best political paper he gave to the Christian religion is not once named. In this work he manifests the fondest solicitude for the future of his country. His sentences are crowded with words of warning and fatherly advice. But he does not seem to be impressed with the idea that the safety of the government or the happiness of the people depends upon Christianity. He recommends a cultivation of the religious sentiment, but evinces no partiality for the popular faith.

"I am persuaded, you will permit me to observe that the path of true piety is so plain as to require but little political direction. To this consideration we ought to ascribe the absence of any regulation, respecting religion, from the Magna-Charta of our country."

-- George Washington, responding to a group of clergymen who complained that the Constitution lacked mention of Jesus Christ, in 1789, Papers, Presidential Series, 4:274, the "Magna-Charta" here refers to the proposed United States Constitution

"Of all the animosities which have existed among mankind, those which are caused by a difference of sentiments in religion appear to be the most inveterate and distressing, and ought to be deprecated. I was in hopes that the enlightened and liberal policy, which has marked the present age, would at least have reconciled Christians of every denomination so far that we should never again see the religious disputes carried to such a pitch as to endanger the peace of society."

-- George Washington, letter to Edward Newenham, October 20, 1792, quoted from Albert J. Menendez and Edd Doerr, The Great Quotations on Religious Freedom, also James A. Haught, 2000 Years of Disbelief

"We have abundant reason to rejoice that in this Land the light of truth and reason has triumphed over the power of bigotry and superstition ... In this enlightened Age and in this Land of equal liberty it is our boast, that a man's religious tenets will not forfeit the protection of the Laws, nor deprive him of the right of attaining and holding the highest Offices that are known in the United States."

-- George Washington, letter to the members of the New Church in Baltimore, January 27, 1793, in Anson Phelps Stokes, Church and State in the United States, Vol 1. p. 497, quoted from Albert J. Menendez and Edd Doerr, The Great Quotations on Religious Freedom

"If they are good workmen, they may be of Asia, Africa, or Europe. They may be Mohometans, Jews or Christians of any Sect, or they may be Atheists."

-- George Washington, letter to Tench Tilghman asking him to secure a carpenter and a bricklayer for his Mount Vernon estate, March 24, 1784, in Paul F. Boller, George Washington & Religion (1963) p. 118, quoted from Ed and Michael Buckner, "Quotations that Support the Separation of State and Church"

Quotes About Washington and Religion/Christianity:

"[Washington was] a total stranger to religious prejudices, which have so often excited Christians of one denomination to cut the throats of those of another."

-- John Bell, in 1779, in Paul F. Boller, George Washington & Religion, Dallas: Southern Methodist University Press, 1963, p. 118, quoted from Ed and Michael Buckner, "Quotations that Support the Separation of State and Church"

""Dr. Rush told me (he had it from Asa Green) that when the clergy addressed General Washington, on his departure from the government, it was observed in their consultation that he had never, on any occasion, said a word to the public which showed a belief in the Christian religion, and they thought they should so pen their address as to force him at length to disclose publicly whether he was a Christian or not. However, he observed, the old fox was too cunning for them. He answered every article of their address particularly, except that, which he passed over without notice."

-- Thomas Jefferson, quoted from Jefferson's Works, Vol. iv., p. 572. (Asa Green "was probably the Reverend Ashbel Green, who was chaplain to congress during Washington's administration." -- Farrell Till in "The Christian Nation Myth.")

"I know that Gouverneur Morris, who claimed to be in his secrets, and believed himself to be so, has often told me that General Washington believed no more in that system [Christianity] than he did."

-- Thomas Jefferson, in his private journal, February, 1800, quoted from Jefferson's Works, Vol. iv., p. 572 ("Gouverneur Morris was the principal drafter of the Constitution of the United States; he was a member of the Continental Congress, a United States senator from New York, and minister to France. He accepted, to a considerable extent, the skeptical views of French Freethinkers." -- John E. Remsberg, Six Historic Americans.)

"Sir, Washington was a Deist."

-- The Reverend Doctor James Abercrombie, rector of the church Washington had attended with his wife, to The Reverend Bird Wilson, an Episcopal minister in Albany, New York, upon Wilson's having inquired of Abercrombie regarding Washington's religious beliefs, quoted from John E. Remsberg, Six Historic Americans

"The pictures that represent him on his knees in the winter forest at Valley Forge are even silly caricatures. Washington was at least not sentimental, and he had nothing about him of the Pharisee that displays his religion at street corners or out in the woods in the sight of observers, or where his portrait could be taken by 'our special artist'!"

-- The Reverend M. J. Savage, quoted from Franklin Steiner, The Religious Beliefs of Our Presidents, p. 22

""I have diligently perused every line that Washington ever gave to the public, and I do not find one expression in which he pledges, himself as a believer in Christianity. I think anyone who will candidly do as I have done, will come to the conclusion that he was a Deist and nothing more."

-- The Reverend Bird Wilson, an Episcopal minister in Albany, New York, in an interview with Mr. Robert Dale Owen written on November 13, 1831, which was publlshed in New York two weeks later, quoted from Franklin Steiner, The Religious Beliefs of Our Presidents, pp. 27

"[/b]On communion Sundays, he left the church with me after the blessing [before the sacrament], and returned home,[/b] and we sent the carriage back after my grandmother."

-- George Custis, letter to Mr. Sparks on February 26, 1833, in Sparks's Washington, p. 521, quoted from Franklin Steiner, The Religious Beliefs of Our Presidents, pp. 29

"Unlike Thomas Jefferson -- and Thomas Paine, for that matter -- Washington never even got around to recording his belief that Christ was a great ethical teacher. His reticence on the subject was truly remarkable. Washington frequently alluded to Providence in his private correspondence. But the name of Christ, in any correspondence whatsoever, does not appear anywhere in his many letters to friends and associates throughout his life."

-- Paul F. Boller, George Washington & Religion (1963) pp. 74-75, quoted from Ed and Michael Buckner, "Quotations that Support the Separation of State and Church."

"George Washington's conduct convinced most Americans that he was a good Christian, but those possessing first-hand knowledge of his religious convictions had reasons for doubt."

-- Barry Schwartz, George Washington: The Making of an American Symbol (1987) p. 170, quoted from Ed and Michael Buckner, "Quotations that Support the Separation of State and Church"


So in closing, someone who asks something like "you mean to tell me a bunch of Christians who founded this country did not use a lot of Christianity influence to set up laws and governments?" is asking a fallacious question... because the country was not founded by Christians nor did it use Christian influence in the first place. This is just another myth being disseminated by the Religious Intolerants who wish to make this nation as fundamentalist as the Muslim ones they decry.

And one could argue, as it goes against the actual ideals and intentions of the Framers, to say it is could even be.... Un-American...
smile.gif


(Debating with the son of a Political Historian sucks, don't it?
wink.gif
)[/QUOTE]
I knew you would just jump right in. Didn't you bring up GW Bush?
 
In that same since YES I SEE RACISM EVERY DAY when lil ole ladies grap their purses or lock their doors when I walk by YES  I SEE RACISM everyday when I get a second look because I'm riding through a predominately white neighborhood.



I'm concerned for them though, because when Christ returns he won't have a colored line and a white line.
Jesus H Christ ...

 Bigdog... you own a mirror right?

  I'm fearless(thru stupidty and arrogance,a slight death-wish,etc etc ) but ya know what....I'm not all that interested in a "Cage-Match" with you...you hear what I'm sayin'...

 You've made yourself look intimidating Bruva.

 They dont clutch their purses cause yer black, they clutch them because yer a few hundred pounds of shaved head with giant arms , and a "Not-so-nice" look on your face.

  I speak from experience.  I almost didn't get my last job because the HIRING PEOPLE thought I looked too intimidating.
 I was being discriminated against... not for skin color,but just beacause...I weigh a couple hundred pounds,have alot of old jailhouse tattoo's,and a NOT SO NICE look ...

  I picked you outa the crowd BigDawg so that I wouldn't get shid from guys like....."you know who"....that,and I figured yer a cool guy,who wont get all  PISSY.

 I think folks can do alot to help themselves,and their race/creed/group if they would...

    <span style='color:limegreen'>JUST TOW THE LINE</span>

  "Society" has a perception.  
     They have what they believe too be ACCEPTABLE.
      They also have what they deem to be NON-ACCEPTABLE.
 
  In that catagory sits BIGDAWG. But in that catagory also sits Rubbah.  I'm white. He's black.  So fuggin' what.  Black white yellow does it really matter?

  Poeple will always find something.  If you are not prepared to   TOW THE LINE, and fit neatly and orderly into one of the acceptable catagories...  you'll most likely find yourself ostracized by the community.


  I guess, for me, I just don't see what all the pissin' an' moanin' is about.  I do what I want,when I want.  Don't you?
 Everybody on this board owns an expensive motorcycle,lives in a nice place, has a great job, moves about the city and country they live in....  whats all the pissin' about?


Racism is everywhere...its easier to find...if yer lookin' for it.

  If ya know what I mean.


Couple years ago me an' the house mouse are in Cali. We are gonna do the tourist thing an' head over to Universal Studios.
On the way ol Rubb decides he's hungry. We stop in a "not-so-nice" part of South Central L.A.   Just about every biz-ness is closed on a permanant basis(all boarded up),there's a "shopping cart guy" every ten feet, there isn't a "WHITEY" for miles.  I say "I'm hungry,Lets eat".   My wife says, "Are you nuts,look where we are".  
 She was right.  There was  RACISM  everywhere. We went into this eatery,sat down,and low and behold...we were they only honkee's  in  da  joint.  As I look back on it, I can understand how and why she was scared and nervous. We were WHITE.    So... I got us some grub as quikly as possible and got my lil house mouse out of harms way.  Why were we in "Harms Way".   We were in harms way because we were WHITE.


  Bottom Line:   JUST ABOUT EVERYONE IS DISCRIMINATED AGAINST IN ONE FORM OR ANOTHER.

  Fat chicks, chinese men, Italian Jews, skinny black girls, white canadian men and women....

  where will it end....

   it will end when folks get together and wake up.  when they just enjoy each others company.  the past is,just that,the past. cant we just move on. why does it have to be black anything. or white anything.

  THERE WILL ALWAYS BE GROUPS.

   and thats cool....as long as they are MILD.

   this is HAYABUSA.ORG...   we dont really need a bunch of ZX12 owners in here all the time bustin' our chops...
  we have better things to do,we have Busa's to diagnose,repair,customize, and generally talk about.

 but here in this group...we have white,chinese,Jew,Christian,Mexican,East Indian,Chinese...
  even some French Canadians....yuk...

   but for the most part we get along....its not Black.org  or white dot.org.    Its Busa.org.  A common ground.


  I dunno....  the KKK meeting every Friday....
      are they not just bringing it upon themselves
rock.gif


  I dunno...  black bike week...
    are they not just bringing it upon themselves???

  I dunno...   neo nazis...meeting...
    are they just not bringing it upon themselves???

  I dunno...   Johavas Witneses...???

   

   

     I forgot the Greeks....  O shid, now I'm in trouble....
RSD, you have a good point, may groups do bring things upon themselves, and racism is much easier to see when one is looking for it. I was blind to racism for many years, I pray that my sons will be blind to it forever. I learned about it at the hands of others. I couldn't understand why someone would hate me simply because my skin has a different tone than theirs. I think that some people are hyper-sensitive toward the issue, I think that some are totally de-sensitized also. Neither of these is ideal, but you gotta get through your day. In a perfect world, this wouldn't be an issue, but that ain't where I live. Among the people I consider friends, a group that consists of just about every concievable variation in the human race, all know that skin color is totally irrelevant, it's the person that matters. I think that this is prolly the case with most of the members here, but it's very interesting how strong of a reponse this topic brings, on both sides........
 
I just wanted to make my last comment on this thread....I sometimes play this game online named SOCOMII. It is supposed to be for mature audiences, however, a lot of kids as young as 7 play this game. SOCOMII allows you create screen names and allows you to talk to members on your teams. Some of the screen names that I have seen are so racially explicit that I cannot believe my eyes! I hear these 7 year old kids say some of the most demeaning racial slurs that I can't believe my ears! It's gotten so bad that I quite playing the game. It's just sad! Very sad!
 
Wow! I leave the board for a few days and look what the cat dragged in! It has been interesting digesting all of the diverse opinions and heart-felt feelings on this sensitive subject. I am also encouraged to see that for the most part it has remained civil and rational without pointless mudslinging and ad hominem attacks.

Now for my two cents... My favorite movie is Forrest Gump. I graduated college with a degree in History and Political Science, so the history of the movie was compelling to me, but moreso was the innocence of the eyes through which it was viewed. A low IQ boy grows into manhood with no pretences, no racism, and no hatred. In doing so, his view of the world causes the rest of us to take a long hard look at how we have learned to view the world, and who is really the one that has some learning to do. I try hard everyday to be a better person who can view others in a similar manner to this fictitious movie character. Obviously, I have fallen short on many occasions, but I continue to strive on a daily basis to be more Christ-like in my actions toward others. Racism does exist, and unfortunately there is no magic fix-all cure any government or institution can apply to make it suddenly disappear. Everyone on this earth has the freedom to choose their thoughts, opinions, and beliefs, and we can do nothing about the negative feelings some may harbor towards us. We can however choose how we will respond and how we choose to think and act in our own lives. Let's focus on that element of this grand equation that we can control... ourselves. An old phrase from a perfect example of self control comes to mind; "Father forgive them, for they know not what they do."

We are victims only if we choose to be. If people want to spew hatred against our race, socio-economic status, religion, or creed, they will always be free to do so in this country. How we react to that vitriol is the true measure of a man.



<!--EDIT|warbrown
Reason for Edit: None given...|1117594288 -->
 
In that same since YES I SEE RACISM EVERY DAY when lil ole ladies grap their purses or lock their doors when I walk by YES  I SEE RACISM everyday when I get a second look because I'm riding through a predominately white neighborhood.



I'm concerned for them though, because when Christ returns he won't have a colored line and a white line.
Jesus H Christ ...

 Bigdog... you own a mirror right?

  I'm fearless(thru stupidty and arrogance,a slight death-wish,etc etc ) but ya know what....I'm not all that interested in a "Cage-Match" with you...you hear what I'm sayin'...

 You've made yourself look intimidating Bruva.

 They dont clutch their purses cause yer black, they clutch them because yer a few hundred pounds of shaved head with giant arms , and a "Not-so-nice" look on your face.

  I speak from experience.  I almost didn't get my last job because the HIRING PEOPLE thought I looked too intimidating.
 I was being discriminated against... not for skin color,but just beacause...I weigh a couple hundred pounds,have alot of old jailhouse tattoo's,and a NOT SO NICE look ...

  I picked you outa the crowd BigDawg so that I wouldn't get shid from guys like....."you know who"....that,and I figured yer a cool guy,who wont get all  PISSY.

 I think folks can do alot to help themselves,and their race/creed/group if they would...

    <span style='color:limegreen'>JUST TOW THE LINE</span>

  "Society" has a perception.  
     They have what they believe too be ACCEPTABLE.
      They also have what they deem to be NON-ACCEPTABLE.
 
  In that catagory sits BIGDAWG. But in that catagory also sits Rubbah.  I'm white. He's black.  So fuggin' what.  Black white yellow does it really matter?

  Poeple will always find something.  If you are not prepared to   TOW THE LINE, and fit neatly and orderly into one of the acceptable catagories...  you'll most likely find yourself ostracized by the community.


  I guess, for me, I just don't see what all the pissin' an' moanin' is about.  I do what I want,when I want.  Don't you?
 Everybody on this board owns an expensive motorcycle,lives in a nice place, has a great job, moves about the city and country they live in....  whats all the pissin' about?


Racism is everywhere...its easier to find...if yer lookin' for it.

  If ya know what I mean.


Couple years ago me an' the house mouse are in Cali. We are gonna do the tourist thing an' head over to Universal Studios.
On the way ol Rubb decides he's hungry. We stop in a "not-so-nice" part of South Central L.A.   Just about every biz-ness is closed on a permanant basis(all boarded up),there's a "shopping cart guy" every ten feet, there isn't a "WHITEY" for miles.  I say "I'm hungry,Lets eat".   My wife says, "Are you nuts,look where we are".  
 She was right.  There was  RACISM  everywhere. We went into this eatery,sat down,and low and behold...we were they only honkee's  in  da  joint.  As I look back on it, I can understand how and why she was scared and nervous. We were WHITE.    So... I got us some grub as quikly as possible and got my lil house mouse out of harms way.  Why were we in "Harms Way".   We were in harms way because we were WHITE.


  Bottom Line:   JUST ABOUT EVERYONE IS DISCRIMINATED AGAINST IN ONE FORM OR ANOTHER.

  Fat chicks, chinese men, Italian Jews, skinny black girls, white canadian men and women....

  where will it end....

   it will end when folks get together and wake up.  when they just enjoy each others company.  the past is,just that,the past. cant we just move on. why does it have to be black anything. or white anything.

  THERE WILL ALWAYS BE GROUPS.

   and thats cool....as long as they are MILD.

   this is HAYABUSA.ORG...   we dont really need a bunch of ZX12 owners in here all the time bustin' our chops...
  we have better things to do,we have Busa's to diagnose,repair,customize, and generally talk about.

 but here in this group...we have white,chinese,Jew,Christian,Mexican,East Indian,Chinese...
  even some French Canadians....yuk...

   but for the most part we get along....its not Black.org  or white dot.org.    Its Busa.org.  A common ground.


  I dunno....  the KKK meeting every Friday....
      are they not just bringing it upon themselves
rock.gif


  I dunno...  black bike week...
    are they not just bringing it upon themselves???

  I dunno...   neo nazis...meeting...
    are they just not bringing it upon themselves???

  I dunno...   Johavas Witneses...???

   

   

     I forgot the Greeks....  O shid, now I'm in trouble....
You're right RSD, there are so many different methods of discrimination and I think usually it comes from people unable to identify with people who don't look/act/pray/worship like them. Whether it's a black man, skinny latin women, midget (hm hm little person), hobbit, wizard, 7'5" female cliff diver discrimination is still wrong.

Honestly though, I think the percentage of racist individuals that exist today are in the minority as compared to years prior.  But we're all guilty of a lil prejudice & discrimination, myself included, towards people who don't look like us.  We could all learn alot from each other in those respects.  I'm glad most of us don't just limit ourselves based on culture.

Well said RSD and I definitely see your side of the coin.  Sometimes we need to remember there is more than one side to every coin.

BD



<!--EDIT|BigDawg_03Busa
Reason for Edit: None given...|1117596236 -->
 
(Debating with the son of a Political Historian sucks, don't it?
wink.gif
)
Political Historian, or Historical revisionist? George Washington's words speak for themselves.
Hahaha... again, great job glossing over everything and trying to make reality fit your own... interesting... view.  Revisionist indeed.

then again, that tends to be par for the course for someone who doesn't actually have a sufficient rebuttal.

Way to ignore everything that was brought up, again.  Your dogma is showing, Kev.
wink.gif




<!--EDIT|RandomNickname
Reason for Edit: None given...|1117603220 -->

wink.gif
 
Honestly though, I think the percentage of racist individuals that exist today are in the minority as compared to years prior. But we're all guilty of a lil prejudice & discrimination, myself included, towards people who don't look like us. We could all learn alot from each other in those respects. I'm glad most of us don't just limit ourselves based on culture.[/QUOTE]

It's a good point, and definitely is a good thing that more people are less likely to limit themselves based on culture... for one thing it opens up the number of women one can date.
wink.gif


Seriously though, the percentage of people are down, but I wonder if the dramatic drop in that is real or perceived... how many in that change represent people who have truly changed their outlook, and how many of them represent people who have simply managed to keep their discriminatory ways in the closet, so to speak?

I know that people of all sorts, pretty much everyone of us, harbor views that aren't completely kosher, whether it be about a group, a person, whatever. You notice it in the way people look at others, or lower their voice, or maybe look around before telling a particularly off-color joke. *shrug*

And what about other discriminatory or "separatist" groups? A few months ago, a brit bike mag (either T.W.O. or Bike -- don't remember which) did a story on a pair of biker clubs, both were homosexual in nature (one gay men, one lesbian)... makes me wonder how man other groups out there, not just based on skin color are out there, secluding themselves (excluding?) from others based on race, religion, orientation, height, weight, whatever.

Discrimination and superficial exclusion tends to be everywhere... it is somewhat ingrained human nature, unfortunately. I think the real question is to what extent are we willing to look past it and try to bring ourselves above that base human condition.
 
Honestly though, I think the percentage of racist individuals that exist today are in the minority as compared to years prior.  But we're all guilty of a lil prejudice & discrimination, myself included, towards people who don't look like us.  We could all learn alot from each other in those respects.  I'm glad most of us don't just limit ourselves based on culture.

It's a good point, and definitely is a good thing that more people are less likely to limit themselves based on culture... for one thing it opens up the number of women one can date.
wink.gif


Seriously though, the percentage of people are down, but I wonder if the dramatic drop in that is real or perceived... how many in that change represent people who have truly changed their outlook, and how many of them represent people who have simply managed to keep their discriminatory ways in the closet, so to speak?[/QUOTE]
Question to ponder, but I know I won't loose any sleep over it. Like I said it's their loss, not mine. I'll give every man/woman/child/bird/fish/cat/dog the benefit of the doubt. They're God's children, not mine so if they have issues withme because of my skin color I feel poorly for the shallow minded souls.

Man I'll be honest to you, when I play Halo2 on xbox live I hear the "N" world at least once a day from what sounds like some teenage kid hiding behind an internet gaming ID name.

The first time I heard it I told the guy to quit being a punk hiding behind the screen. Now I just laugh and think to myself, I need to start working on my Italian or Latin accent LOL
laugh.gif
 
Kevin Kesler,

  I totally understand wanting to be with your own group when that group is being discriminated against, I was in Japan long enough to get the idea how that feels. I can't believe I even bought a Japanese bike now that I remember the way I was treated over there.
sorry you had to go through that in japan.

however, to be mistreated in a foreign country based on your color skin or the country you're from is bad but to be mistreated based on color skin by your fellow citizens is wayyyyy beyond bad imo.
 
Now that my reading skills are up to par ......
This was really was not as heated as I thought it would be.
Everyone made some decent to relevant points. Racism does still exist. We all discriminate in some form or fashion.

I just want it to be said that I know I speak for a lot of blacks when I say that we aren't all represented by Jesse and Al. And yes at large recreational events black folks as a whole take the blame for a few fuggers that got out of line, and need their asses kicked regardless of their race.

It is funny when I ride, I wave at everyone on a bike, cause I know if nothing else, we have at least one thing in common. Of course not everyone waves back, but fug em.

When my kid get to this shiddy world of ours, I will do my best to keep his thoughts free from the madness as long as possible. History is important. If yo don't know where ya came from, you may never find out where you are going!! It is up to us all to make the future better than the past.

Rubbah made a good point, this is Hayabusa.org. We talk down on other bikes at times, but when I had my ZX9, I thought it was the shitt and you couldn't tell me anything different. Now I have a Busa, and I see what I was missing !! So let us not discriminate against those on slower bikes, wave at all of them fuggers when ya pass em. If you are moving fast enough you can't tell what color they are under the helmet !!
 
All BS aside, I agree with Bill Cosby on some of the stuff he said.  No matter what color you are, if you are on welfare and live in public housing, then it ain't no justifiable reason for your ass to have a big screen TV or a Lexus !!

That goes for blacks, whites, hispanics, asians, native americans, and anyone else.

Those are definitely examples of fugged up priorities.  Stupidity does not discriminate
wow.gif




<!--EDIT|Southside Playa
Reason for Edit: "spelling"|1117673474 -->
 
Completely, stupid but, I got a stupid question, why do some races require a seperate event, and other races if they had a seperate even based on their skin color they would be considered racists/biggots? I thought Bikers as a general term that covers ALL Bikers not just a black biker event or a white biker event? Would a White Bike Week event be ok, or would that be too racist? Just wondering and all as I said above, I thought Bikers ment just that as this post refers too... color of bike and helmet not the color of th skin of who's riding?
good point,


BTW, I am promoting a French Canadian with webbed toes bike ride in Jersey next weekend.

I'll probably be by myself
laugh.gif
 
Back
Top