+1(CAT3 @ Feb. 23 2007,07:16) Well, this is a repost at least once since I've been active here, and last time it was about the same. 87 is what Suzi built the Busa to run on, its what its tuned for, and you really wont see any benefit from anything else IMHO. As for 92 being "cleaner" I seriously doubt it. More likely where the gas is coming from, if you use a pump thats notorious for being dirty or having water issues thats one thing. Or if your built and tuned for something requiring more/less octane than you might have issues running other than the recommended rating.
Explaination of my opinion: The Busa is a lower static compression (compared to other liter (+) bikes. The Busa has different valve timing events lowering the dynamic compression. Based off that, and the timing, the Busa is able to obtain more efficient burn of intake charge using 87octane than it will 92. The higher the octane, the slower the charge burns in general (if you doubt this, go fill your tank with 110octane race fuel and run the quarter mile compare that to the 87octane run, you will see the race gas is slower). Carbon build-up is a result of improper charge density, too slow of a burn, electrical/mechanical defect...
Now the grey area, like our brains Modify the Busa, and you may need to run more octane, like increasing the timing, leaning out the AFR, raising the compression (dynamic or static, and definately if both are raised) and lowering the compression out of its efficiency range; all of these actions require a higher octane (except lowered compression which may want lower octane, sans boost and modified dynamic compression) to keep the engine from detonating. Detonation, however slight, will lead to carbon build-up, just as much as too low/high timing (effecting how much and the charge is burnt).
There is much more to this conversation but thats should be enough for now...and I have a migraine.
Charlie
There os a valve for each individual octane. Which ever you select at the pump it shuts off the other. If the station needs to know how much 93 or 87 they can tell that to. SORRY all its late andd i am pretty drunk. cant wait for warm weather to ride and NOT drink!(BlueHaya @ Feb. 23 2007,10:13) All fuels have cleaners in them now.
My question is why are there 3 grades of fuel. Some gas stations have meters on the pumps to show how much fuel has gone through the pump...and unless a pump also has diesel there are only 2 meters. If there are 3 grades should there not be 3 meters. Makes you wonder if there even is a 87 octane or if it is actually 89 and 93. The ratings are minimums not exacts. Makes you wonder.
Nice technique!(CAT3 @ Feb. 24 2007,01:25) Seems a little difficult to find a pump that wouldn't be top tier? I know several stations not listed, are actually supplied from top tier companies, just sold thru different names. Guess its more homework for those really worried about it.
Here's my technique for maintaining a "deposit" free engine.... WOT at least twice per fill-up!
I thought I made my misinformation clear on subsequent post but the name "premium" 93 octane and about thirty cents per gallon led me to believe it was better fuel. As I stated that is what is great about this board, guess I need to do some homework.(DaCol. @ Feb. 23 2007,21:05)So , explain why you think 93 is the BEST ? Now, you must base this on gasoline facts and combustion needs, OK !!!
Just wondering
Me, I use 87 as recommended since I think the guy who designed the bikes engine probably knows alot more about it than me. And I've never had any problems with 87, with absolutely NO difference in driveability when I used higher. So, how do you define BEST
+1(heavybusa @ Feb. 23 2007,07:35)You are a smart dude Charlie!(CAT3 @ Feb. 23 2007,10:16) Well, this is a repost at least once since I've been active here, and last time it was about the same. 87 is what Suzi built the Busa to run on, its what its tuned for, and you really wont see any benefit from anything else IMHO. As for 92 being "cleaner" I seriously doubt it. More likely where the gas is coming from, if you use a pump thats notorious for being dirty or having water issues thats one thing. Or if your built and tuned for something requiring more/less octane than you might have issues running other than the recommended rating.
Explaination of my opinion: The Busa is a lower static compression (compared to other liter (+) bikes. The Busa has different valve timing events lowering the dynamic compression. Based off that, and the timing, the Busa is able to obtain more efficient burn of intake charge using 87octane than it will 92. The higher the octane, the slower the charge burns in general (if you doubt this, go fill your tank with 110octane race fuel and run the quarter mile compare that to the 87octane run, you will see the race gas is slower). Carbon build-up is a result of improper charge density, too slow of a burn, electrical/mechanical defect...
Now the grey area, like our brains Modify the Busa, and you may need to run more octane, like increasing the timing, leaning out the AFR, raising the compression (dynamic or static, and definately if both are raised) and lowering the compression out of its efficiency range; all of these actions require a higher octane (except lowered compression which may want lower octane, sans boost and modified dynamic compression) to keep the engine from detonating. Detonation, however slight, will lead to carbon build-up, just as much as too low/high timing (effecting how much and the charge is burnt).
There is much more to this conversation but thats should be enough for now...and I have a migraine.
Charlie
Likely C16 in the drag car. It will run like crap in a stock Busa. It is designed for ultra high compression, big nitrous, or boosted applications. Yes it burns much slow to resist detonation in those apps.(RYC1966 @ Jun. 13 2007,17:40) I don't want to get slammed, but in a drag car...with a 632 in, 2 stage nos kit we use vp fuel c14 or c16, not sure exactly. I understand that is burns slower and more complete throught the ign firing...does this make sense.
I understand that this is a different application, c16 is what the engine builder recomends...to add another dimension, we have a data pac for drive shaft, clutch,rear gear, and egt...does anybody have experience with the latest and greatest 02 sensors? Ones that would work with leaded fuel and nos blasts? Just reaching for tuning tips from a group that applies sniffer gauges to the bike world...20 questions has begun...