I personally think the "feel good" people will buy an EV with the whole thought of saving the planet when in reality they are just substituting one polluter for another that doesn't show pollution at a tail pipe..
Well there is the "feel good" vs the reality. I made a living for a time in the coal industry. More specifically we made fuel augmentations. Using tire chunks added to the coal and regulating the oxygen in combustion, we were able to burn coal cleaner, burn it longer per ton burned, and burn it cheaper.
I'll never sell it as "green" burning, but we were able to burn it cleaner than every govt mandated emission level. For less $$ than doing nothing to it. And far less $$ than outfitting all of the plants with scrubber technologies.
The other big benefit was taking some burden away from landfills. Which are rapidly being filled up. Nobody wants to compare those variables.
There was a little bit of a giant loophole in the regs we exploited. It was either written in on purpose to be there, or it was simply lack of oversight when they passed it.
Burning a recycled tire was counted as a non fossil fuel, fuel. Any reduction in coal use, was provided an equivalent carbon credit. The data will be able to state plant X reduced coal use by X%, using non fossil fuels.
Never having to state what was used in place of.
Some of that is still part of the green numbers in use today. Today there is a growing business in Waste To Energy industry. Because that WTE benefits the landfill management that's a bigger problem than a solar or wind station being built. Or an EV being purchased.
Dallas Texas generated 13M tires per year in 2018. That is probably a lot more now that half of Ca has moved there since. That's just DFW! At full capacity of recovery and re-use, 8M still went to landfill. If I showed you what 8M tires looked like in a pile, nobody would give the first phuck how green a Tesla might be.
They do a really good job at convincing us to take our eye off the ball with some new shiny object.