EV vehicles

Meta title: Mr.

Meta description: 20


I can only go off the data I read and hear about as I'm not in the auto business nor am I in the power generation field...but I am adept at research and can find pretty much anything I need to form an educated opinion. But like all people I have to rely on the experts who are in these fields as well as public opinion of actual EV owners. I didn't own a Hayabusa until 2017 but did a lot of research to know which bike I wanted and what to look for....I had to rely on experts who either did reviews on it or actual owners to help formulate my decision.

I can say that pretty much sums up most if not all people on this forum.

As we have found over the 1399 posts on the subject, it is controversial......the most discussion is taking place between people who don't own an EV and never plan on getting one (although it might be forced upon us to do so).

As a former soldier who spent lots of time in a special forces role and has a degree in military history, I can comment with vigor in those sorts of threads.....I am well versed in strategic and tactical employment of military operations and how they equate to the current conflicts we are seeing.

I have EV remote controlled cars and have been around them for over 30 years so I know the benefits of EV over gas powered RC....my EV would stomp the nitro cars but while I'm cooling my electronics and waiting until my battery cools enough to recharge it, they are still ripping around having fun....
I'd own one. As soon as they are practical. Probably not in my lifetime. I think they are overall simpler from a power train perspective.

And Elon has shown there is some "common sense" contributions to the automotive industry. Example. Run an A/C system without needing to have an ICE running it's engine.
 
Last edited:
By the way Bee. Nice job. It worked great. You idiot. :-)
Tom, you taunted me and taunted me, until I took the bait.
For me it started out with one guy repeatedly telling the thread posters how highly educated he was and jumping in your chyt telling you how uneducated you were. For God's sakes he at one point actually proposed he was smarter than the whole country of Canada. Noone there knows enough about electricity compared to him.

Bee you have a different higher education. You've had to train and organize soldiers to carry out coordinated and organized military operations in very harsh climates and circumstances. From reading your post, I suspect it was your whole career. You taught them common sense and how to rely on it. That has led you well in this thread. You may get caught up in things you didn't know technically. But you don't mind learning. That never makes you wrong. You've gotten better at smelling b/s as this thread has run it's course.

I looked around the site a little. I saw that you knew nothing about Hayabusa starting issues either. How'd that work out after others started posting starting issues with theirs?

Blanca arguing over the current Gaza conflict. Whatya know Blanca, just wasn't educated enough in that thread either.

Then this latest. A self described highly educated, data analysis skilled engineer. Types into his calculator a few keystrokes and says 6000%.

And apparently doesn't once stop and say to himself, can this really be 6000%? It's the first thing I asked myself. I knew his calculator wasn't malfunctioning. So I looked at the link. It's not my first rodeo having to either compose data, or decompose it.

I have a lot of data holes that I'd like to see filled.

Did they define what makes up a fire for an example? Seems like a silly question. But you can have a catastrophic total loss of a vehicle fire. Or you can have a localized fire contained to a small area of a vehicle with less than $1000 damage. Both are fires.

What portion of the 1529 and 25 were fires caused from moving traffic accidents?

Did they find 1529 going back 4 years or 44 years?

By the way Bee. His link confirms you were right about more than one thing you stated in this thread that you got a lot of chyt when you tried to bring it into discussion here.
Now you have sour grapes?

I can defend every statement you made above, but really, in the spirit of the Org, is it necessary to fill several more pages with this nonsense, to and fro?

As a fellow Org member (we have both been here a long time) I reach out with a hand of friendship towards you.

Let's both be the bigger and better persons here and move on from here, on a positive note, and in the spirit of the ORG.

If that is not good for you, put me on your ignore list and I will do the same.
 
Calls one a dumbarse and then wants to be friends.
1705778993816.gif


1 can’t be 2 remember……
 
Tom, you taunted me and taunted me, until I took the bait.

Now you have sour grapes?

I can defend every statement you made above, but really, in the spirit of the Org, is it necessary to fill several more pages with this nonsense, to and fro?

As a fellow Org member (we have both been here a long time) I reach out with a hand of friendship towards you.

Let's both be the bigger and better persons here and move on from here, on a positive note, and in the spirit of the ORG.

If that is not good for you, put me on your ignore list and I will do the same.
I have no sour grapes. I don't have any friends that believe they are superior to others. I'm not about to start now. I've met many people superior to me in some way. Not one of them ever felt the need to tell me I should.

I will feel no sense of loss in either ignoring you or being ignored by you.
 
Well I'm a bit late to this party, but I'll toss in my thoughts. When it all began no one paid any attention to things like the fact EV's are half as heavy again as a comparable gas powered car, nor was the issue of the long mining and production chains mentioned. It was like they came magically out of these Tesla factories at no cost to the environment and would last forever. Well we know a bit more now, a lot more, and big players like Ford and Hertz are making choices that seem at odds with the EV dream. In investment there is a clear trend that is followed by different groups. The first to get out with profits are termed the "smart money" they are followed by the institutional investors and corporations, and lastly, the public. In nearly all cases the public are the ones left holding the bag, losing their money.

Has anyone looked at EV share prices lately? Noticed the collapse of all the startup EV builders? Read about the collapse of the charging station companies all across America? Perhaps not... But Ford and Hertz are clear examples of big players backing out of the Dream, and these actions speak more than anything as pointers to the future. Toyota, arguably the best and most productive car manufacturer on the planet never even went there. They regarded the EV as a dead-end though they started the whole thing with the Prius (Pre-Arse) But a hybrid is gas powered car so they don't even come into this discussion.

But let's leave all that aside for now and consider a barrel of oil. What's in it? Heavy fractions for shipping (bunker oil) heavier still fractions for road building (asphalt) And lots of diesel and gasoline as well as Kero etc. No one believes that earth-moving will transition to electric, it's just not feasible. Though one poster on another forum refuted that by posting about an big electric dump truck. He hadn't looked beyond the Caterpillar marketing though, it has electric motors and a huge generator, powered by a massive diesel engine. (see bottom of post) Long haul trucking isn't feasible either, though they have their pet experiments, and short trip units. So in the future we will need diesel to keep the world turning and plow the fields. That is if we want the utopian future

So what do you do with the billions of gallons of Gasoline that still comes out of the oil when it's refined? It's price will crash if it's not burned in cars, and if it's price crashes then everyone will want to burn it in their cars. That's the dilemma no one is talking about. And even if you did away with diesel you'd still need the other products, unless people expect to have inner city streets paved with gravel? And forget concrete, it's hugely expensive as is the steel used in it. Oil products can be cracked into lighter fractions easily but not into heavier ones so you can't make heavy fuels out of it. That's half the problem with the shale oils, they are light. Very little diesel. The biggest headfuk for the proponents of the EV is "Why would they go to all this trouble, why would all the politicians and car makers be onboard if it was a dead-end?" Well that's just capitalism for you, it takes no regard of practical necessity, it's only aim is profits and a lot of people have made HUGE profits out of this one. Sales of EV are still rising, but the rate of sales increase has been falling for nearly a year. When the rate turns negative, so will sales.

About 3 years ago I seriously considered a Nissan leaf but after 3 months of research I dismissed the idea. I thought I could charge it at home on my solar and use it travel to the nearby city, but once I learned about the battery degradation curve I realized I would have to buy a new one every 5 or 6 years. I like to keep vehicles a lot longer than that. Expensive city toys IMO.



Caterpillar's All Electric 793​

Behold the new Caterpillar 793 prototype, which could well be literally the biggest electric vehicle launch of the year. Yes, it’s a massive battery-powered mining truck.


The behemoth has been unveiled by the American construction vehicle firm at its Arizona proving ground, which Caterpillar is also transforming into a test bed for a sustainable ‘mine of the future’ that is powered by renewable energy. Now, clearly you can have some debate about how whether the merits of sustainable mining, but at least an electric mining truck would replace one powered by a ludicrously big Diesel engine.

The battery electric 793 prototype was demonstrated ...

The new machine is effectively an electric version of the existing Caterpillar 793F, which is available in various forms and in standard version is powered by a quad turbocharged diesel engine that produces 1976kW (2650bhp). Which is enough to, quite literally, make a lot of earth move.



A true all electric mining truck, though a baby one, and more of a gimmick

 
Use the other guys. You’ll get a 6000% increase!
No way. Not without protection. I may contract multipliers sclerosis.

Of course it also depends on how you identify what sex is. In Bee's case he hopes to get a nice warm wind once in awhile as he mows his lawn. That could be sex at his stage.
 
Last edited:
Well I'm a bit late to this party, but I'll toss in my thoughts. When it all began no one paid any attention to things like the fact EV's are half as heavy again as a comparable gas powered car, nor was the issue of the long mining and production chains mentioned. It was like they came magically out of these Tesla factories at no cost to the environment and would last forever. Well we know a bit more now, a lot more, and big players like Ford and Hertz are making choices that seem at odds with the EV dream. In investment there is a clear trend that is followed by different groups. The first to get out with profits are termed the "smart money" they are followed by the institutional investors and corporations, and lastly, the public. In nearly all cases the public are the ones left holding the bag, losing their money.

Has anyone looked at EV share prices lately? Noticed the collapse of all the startup EV builders? Read about the collapse of the charging station companies all across America? Perhaps not... But Ford and Hertz are clear examples of big players backing out of the Dream, and these actions speak more than anything as pointers to the future. Toyota, arguably the best and most productive car manufacturer on the planet never even went there. They regarded the EV as a dead-end though they started the whole thing with the Prius (Pre-Arse) But a hybrid is gas powered car so they don't even come into this discussion.

But let's leave all that aside for now and consider a barrel of oil. What's in it? Heavy fractions for shipping (bunker oil) heavier still fractions for road building (asphalt) And lots of diesel and gasoline as well as Kero etc. No one believes that earth-moving will transition to electric, it's just not feasible. Though one poster on another forum refuted that by posting about an big electric dump truck. He hadn't looked beyond the Caterpillar marketing though, it has electric motors and a huge generator, powered by a massive diesel engine. (see bottom of post) Long haul trucking isn't feasible either, though they have their pet experiments, and short trip units. So in the future we will need diesel to keep the world turning and plow the fields. That is if we want the utopian future

So what do you do with the billions of gallons of Gasoline that still comes out of the oil when it's refined? It's price will crash if it's not burned in cars, and if it's price crashes then everyone will want to burn it in their cars. That's the dilemma no one is talking about. And even if you did away with diesel you'd still need the other products, unless people expect to have inner city streets paved with gravel? And forget concrete, it's hugely expensive as is the steel used in it. Oil products can be cracked into lighter fractions easily but not into heavier ones so you can't make heavy fuels out of it. That's half the problem with the shale oils, they are light. Very little diesel. The biggest headfuk for the proponents of the EV is "Why would they go to all this trouble, why would all the politicians and car makers be onboard if it was a dead-end?" Well that's just capitalism for you, it takes no regard of practical necessity, it's only aim is profits and a lot of people have made HUGE profits out of this one. Sales of EV are still rising, but the rate of sales increase has been falling for nearly a year. When the rate turns negative, so will sales.

About 3 years ago I seriously considered a Nissan leaf but after 3 months of research I dismissed the idea. I thought I could charge it at home on my solar and use it travel to the nearby city, but once I learned about the battery degradation curve I realized I would have to buy a new one every 5 or 6 years. I like to keep vehicles a lot longer than that. Expensive city toys IMO.



Caterpillar's All Electric 793​

Behold the new Caterpillar 793 prototype, which could well be literally the biggest electric vehicle launch of the year. Yes, it’s a massive battery-powered mining truck.


The behemoth has been unveiled by the American construction vehicle firm at its Arizona proving ground, which Caterpillar is also transforming into a test bed for a sustainable ‘mine of the future’ that is powered by renewable energy. Now, clearly you can have some debate about how whether the merits of sustainable mining, but at least an electric mining truck would replace one powered by a ludicrously big Diesel engine.

The battery electric 793 prototype was demonstrated ...

The new machine is effectively an electric version of the existing Caterpillar 793F, which is available in various forms and in standard version is powered by a quad turbocharged diesel engine that produces 1976kW (2650bhp). Which is enough to, quite literally, make a lot of earth move.



A true all electric mining truck, though a baby one, and more of a gimmick


Welcome to the party. Most all of this debate comes down to $$. We can't just snap our fingers and make our reliance on fossil fuel go away. But as soon as you can make going electric, or any other fuel source, profitable, it will solve itself.

I also applaud EVs for one thing. Now suddenly ICE wants to build more efficient generations of power. And hydrogen wants to climb aboard. And battery tech is growing rapidly. Elon started it all.

I think what also gets lost in this convo is EV isn't the total solution. It's a part of the solution. We will have some dependence on fossil fuels longer than I can see into the future.

With any economy, the cheaper energy is, the better the economy is. And for some economies, even a barrel of oil is too expensive for them.
 
Last edited:
I have no sour grapes. I don't have any friends that believe they are superior to others. I'm not about to start now. I've met many people superior to me in some way. Not one of them ever felt the need to tell me I should.

I will feel no sense of loss in either ignoring you or being ignored by you.
Ignore activated.
 
Do EV owners top off their car's every night if they are daily drivers ? If ICE owners top off their gas tanks every night it will feel like I'm back in the 70's with Odd/Even plates lol. They better get started on a lot of Nuke power plants before we go full EV's cause the one in Georgia has been in progress for 15 years.
 
Do EV owners top off their car's every night if they are daily drivers ? If ICE owners top off their gas tanks every night it will feel like I'm back in the 70's with Odd/Even plates lol. They better get started on a lot of Nuke power plants before we go full EV's cause the one in Georgia has been in progress for 15 years.
You can't win. A lot of greens are against Nuclear plants.
 
Do EV owners top off their car's every night if they are daily drivers ? If ICE owners top off their gas tanks every night it will feel like I'm back in the 70's with Odd/Even plates lol. They better get started on a lot of Nuke power plants before we go full EV's cause the one in Georgia has been in progress for 15 years.
I guess it depends on how far they commute each day. And if they plug it into the slow charge 110V route because they don't want to spend even more $ to get a 220V charger installed.

My sister drives a Model X. She's retired. So she doesn't need a commute plan. But she does plug in at any charger she gets access to when she takes it out. She doesn't care if takes days to recharge at home on her 110 circuit.

Whenever she plans on leaving town, she rents an ICE.

Yep it's astonishing the resistance there is to nuclear energy. But the recent Japanese disaster is proof bad things can still happen in nuclear.
 
Back
Top