Well firstly I shall ask by what you mean by the term "tune in real time"
I think if you go to a tuner that has a Dynojet Dyno fitted with a tuning link set up then they may struggle as used to letting the software do the work rather than having to corelate the input settings required using their experience to obtain the correct fuel readings.
Correct fueling is correct fueling no matter how it is obtained or the methods used to obtain the desired readings.
So still wondering what is mean't by the statement as below
but it not possible to tune in real-time as with PC III, which is important
Can only think this means being able to adjust as bikes running ? Which may be convienient i will admit but certianly not important
I note your tuner worked thru cell by cell changing settings or copying settings across to ECU Editor ................ no wonder it took for ever
And one also wonders WHY bother to do so
Personally simply load the base .bin file ............. do a fuel run and obtain readings at wide open throttle, stepper graph run to obtain readings again thru out rpm and throttle range >>>>>>>>>>> add or subtract fuel as required to fuel cells as needed re run and check adjustment and done ?
Probably a total of five runs required. Once a custom base map for each particular configuration of pipe fitted etc >>>>>>>> even less required.
I could go on and write a small novel here, but won't >>>>>>>> simply put ECU Editor in the hands of a good competant tuner makes PCIII look exactly as it is. An antiquated "piggy back" system with the added downside of being very prone to failure.
Not out to flame any one here and apologise in advance to any it may offend, but any tuner that struggles with ECU Editor and using the flashing interface sadly isn't worth their salt.
Added note here my own bike (Gen II) had a PC III fitted along with TRE etc
Simply took of and binned unit and reflashed ECU again being honest didn't even look at the map I had custom build in the PC III as once again no reason to even bother doing so as simply built a new map. Isn't this what tuners are supposed to know how to and are paid to do
Again no offence intended but could only say to owners that are spending their dollars, if your tuners struggling to build a map then I would question their competance to do what your paying them for.
Once again stress no offence intended to any party simply stating the facts as in over ten years tuning Busa's ECU Editor has to be the easiest and best by far I have used.
Cheers and happy "Flashing"
Quote
The ECU editor is good but at the moment it does not seem to be possible to optimize the engine without spending a hughe amont of time vs. PC III tuning.
As said correct fueling (which is what optimises engine output) is correct fueling find it hard to understand how or why a good tuner would struggle to obtain the desired settings ?
