My bike baseline dyno'd @ 196!!

[StrtRac3r]

So are they adding an estimated loss to get bhp? That would make alot more sense.

 

[MLSDUKE1]

I can't wait to get mine done when I get home!

 

[bigreef]

This guy made 192 with the brocks....

https://www.hayabusa.org/forum/gen-ii-busa-information/153213-192-rwhp.html

 

[StrtRac3r]

Sounds good enough to me there was a shop near me that would take all your info on the paperwork for dynotuning, and 20% of customers would get jacked at home a month later. I try to do everything myself now cuz of my bias of shops. (obvious dyno is not something I **can't** do myself)

Had to edit ** typo

 

[kennym4]

When I had my bike mapped they told me only a "base map" could be given without having the bike itself on the Dyno ??

 

[IG.]

I think this goes into the category "How to make a bunch of riders happy?" Answer: apply correction factors when doing a dyno of their bikes. LOL

Seriosly, this is only good for bragging rights. Could you answer a simple question - what was the actual HP at the rear wheel of your bike? Because that's what matters, and that's what I'd like to know, and that's the HP you will be applying when you ride.

Then and only then, you can give me correction factors, so that your HP can be compared to other bikes' power.

 

[Flicka]

For reference, the Gen II engine is rated by Suzuki at 194.4 bhp. That is printed on the Certificate of Origin that comes with each bike. I fully believe that one could get 200 at the crank with a full system, but definitely not at the tire on exhaust alone.

Anyway, congrats.

 

[Commuta_Busa]

so what was the highest hp for the event and who's bike had it?

 

[Kildore]

Nice numbers, but does seem high. Not knocking anything, but

 

[bigreef]

so what was the highest hp for the event and who's bike had it?

Well my homeboy and I have the same bike '08 Busa". But he have the full single side ti-force.. He made 199hp...

 

[dadofthree]

This guy made 192 with the brocks....

https://www.hayabusa.org/forum/gen-ii-busa-information/153213-192-rwhp.html

Running 87 octane. Hard to beat Brocks Performance.

 

[paul-g]

what was the tq? do you have dyno sheet showing air fuel! post it up

 

[OldMan]

I think this goes into the category "How to make a bunch of riders happy?" Answer: apply correction factors when doing a dyno of their bikes. LOL

Seriosly, this is only good for bragging rights. Could you answer a simple question - what was the actual HP at the rear wheel of your bike? Because that's what matters, and that's what I'd like to know, and that's the HP you will be applying when you ride.

Then and only then, you can give me correction factors, so that your HP can be compared to other bikes' power.

176 on mine at the wheel.

 

[Johnnycheese]

what was the tq? do you have dyno sheet showing air fuel! post it up

I bet no a/f. I would be surprised if it did have one

 

[StrtRac3r]

That's a smooth power band there old man I heard balancing the injectors is a good idea to help smooth out the throttle, anybody have this done?

 

[bigreef]

I'll posted the whole chart tomorrow....

 

[IG.]

176 on mine at the wheel.

That's pretty good! I assume you have Gen II. Because if it was Gen I that would be amazing, unless you have pretty aggressive mods. What's the deal with A/F ratio between 2k - 4k?

 

[Got-Busa?]

Its BHP. It should be reading that high, no surprise there.

+1


Look at the graph guys...

BHP = A measurement of horsepower delivered at the engine crankshaft.

That means the numbers have been converted to give you CRANK HP results...

Have them give you a conversion at the wheel in SAE or STD and you could be 6-10+% less and more inline with others...

 

[megawatt]

176 on mine at the wheel.

Add 12% to that number to get the BHP and your at 197.

 

[Shinobi'sZ]

Its BHP. It should be reading that high, no surprise there.

Agreed it's not SAE corrected, BHP is at the crank not the wheel.