Exactly. It is reactive to the economy, and here is where we go our separate ways. I believe the people drive the economy, and I think that you believe it starts at the top. Good choices in our lives are evident regardless of who is in office.
We did indeed. You're exact words were "go ahead, find the republicans..." Again, the Bill had full support from both sides of the isle. Stop blaming the left, the right had just as much to do with it. You can go look at the Senate records yourself. It's all available online, no account needed, or you can keep on blaming everyone else.
I will say it again. Go find the Republicans. Executive Orders aren't signed by anyone but him.
I'll do it again, since you "don't remember" this time I'll bookmark it for your future mind lapses...
Have you programmed a PID loop before? Do you understand how to trim Gain.?
You asked for it, here it is AGAIN...
I can’t see this Dude’s posts, on my ignore list.You asked for it, here it is AGAIN...
The Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) originally from the 70's was revised in 1994-1995. The point of the revision was to increase lending to low and moderate income communities.
The CRA was part of a larger bill call "Riegle-Neal Interstate Banking and Branching Efficiency Act of 1994". You can read all about it here...
Loading…
www.congress.gov
Here are the voting records from the senate. You might recognize some of your cuntservative friends, many are still around today.
U.S. Senate: U.S. Senate Roll Call Votes 103rd Congress - 2nd Session
roll_call_vote.xmlwww.senate.gov
Oh, and here is the original thread link where we discussed this in the past...
Fox fires Tucker Carlson | In the News
I won't get into if it would have gotten 2/3 in the house and senate but it doesn't change the facts. A republican led house birthed the bill and Democratic President signed it into law. It is what it is. I don't blame the right or left, I blame them both because they are both responsible and...www.hayabusa.org
That's twice you said go find the republicans involved and that's twice I found them for you.... None of this is executive orders but actually bills in congress supported by both sides of congress.....
And both times you didn't. The link you bookmarked has nothing to do with the Community Reinvestment Act of 1977. That is the statutory basis Clinton's Executive Orders were rooted in. Perhaps some of those Republicans are still around. But they have nothing to do with Clinton's use of it.You asked for it, here it is AGAIN...
The Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) originally from the 70's was revised in 1994-1995. The point of the revision was to increase lending to low and moderate income communities.
The CRA was part of a larger bill call "Riegle-Neal Interstate Banking and Branching Efficiency Act of 1994". You can read all about it here...
Loading…
www.congress.gov
Here are the voting records from the senate. You might recognize some of your cuntservative friends, many are still around today.
U.S. Senate: U.S. Senate Roll Call Votes 103rd Congress - 2nd Session
roll_call_vote.xml
Oh, and here is the original thread link where we discussed this in the past...
Fox fires Tucker Carlson | In the News
I won't get into if it would have gotten 2/3 in the house and senate but it doesn't change the facts. A republican led house birthed the bill and Democratic President signed it into law. It is what it is. I don't blame the right or left, I blame them both because they are both responsible and...
That's twice you said go find the republicans involved and that's twice I found them for you.... None of this is executive orders but actually bills in congress supported by both sides of congress.....
The reason supplies more than doubled in price is the crux. The pandemic threw supply and demand into chaos. Still hasn’t recovered, partly because suppliers fell in love with the new prices.
I’m active in the stock market, been since 1997.
Yes it does, slow down and read more. The CRA was revised, to increase lending in low to moderate communities, those revisions are part of the "Riegle-Neal Interstate Banking and Branching Efficiency Act of 1994" which is what the description and voting links are for.
I'm pretty sure I can read. I went through it twice. In case I couldn't I went and asked for help and found this. They all say with what I read.
If you can't or aren't willing to read it I can't help you there, I'm not going to do it for you.
I already said I read it twice. It should be a simple task for you to find it. You've said you've done it twice. And have provided specific language implying you have. It should be pretty easy the 3rd time.
It doesn't matter, the facts are presented right in front of you and you have your cuntservative blinders on....and executive order arguments are so weak, they can be undone by the next president as easy as they get put in place by the previous president so stop blaming Clinton for a housing and economy crash 8 years after he left, especially if you are going to link it to executive orders.
I see. Yeah facts matter for sure. So far you proclaim they are present. But no one but you seem to know where they are.
Yeah, but it isn't you apparently. What a shame really.
Nope not at all what my first sentence implies. What it does imply is every man who is a man has said same thing about some woman at some point in time. Any time there is more than one together well even when they are alone rofl they say dirty things about women. It’s what men do. Even the most conserved and reserved let loose once in a while and say stuff behind closed doors. Why the world was so surprised over it is beyond me? He just happened to have been hot micced and had it released. The media drummed up what is simple vulgar talk between people in private but it wasn’t.
Not at all dude. I was actually thinking maybe the link you were insistent on dying on the hill for, I may have missed something. You seemed pretty sure of yourself. So I was more patient with you. That turned out to be the only wasted effort in this. When asked for definitive facts you seem to present, you declined. It's OK. It happens. I don't feel any differently about you.
I am, I will say it again for ya.....the revisions to the CRA to allow lending in low to moderate income communities was part of the link I sent you. I also sent you the voting records. If you can't take that and figure it out (drink the water). That is on you not me.... It seems all you are going to do is pretend to not see the pond of water I led you to. Keep on keeping on.
