In the first statement, you separate naive people from others by the term “naive folks”. In the second, you claim we’re all naive to some extent.
Which is it?
Looks like a war is looming in Israel
- Thread starter Bumblebee
- Start date
Which is it?
The post was in reply to Blanca, you chose to challenge it. So I’m curious as to why you interpreted it as an attack on yourself, and counter attacked? Why you thought I was trying to put you down?
It was intended to be the second.
Anyone who believes a seasoned politician in my opinion is naive. In that respect it may be a naive person, in other respects the person may not be naive.
When it comes to emotional thinking, most balanced people are both emotional and practical thinkers. Most women are more emotionally inclined, where men are more practically inclined.
When I suggested you don’t get that, I meant it, you suggested that is rich.
I wish I was more of an emotional thinker, Engineers, Physicists and Scientists tend to be more practically inclined. We unfortunately tend to p!SS off a lot of people, as we don’t recognize their emotional perception. The reason you among others regard me as an a$$hole.
Last edited:
I didn’t imply or think in any way that anybody, including myself, was being attacked. It seemed you contradicted yourself, and I just wanted to clarify. You and I have developed a confrontational relationship, not because we don’t agree politically, but because you, instead of dissecting my opinion, told me I think like I do because I’m unable to understand due to a compromised intellect or because I’m too emotional.
That is not at all difficult to understand or is it groundbreaking information; what is there not to get? It was not the topic, either. You psycho analyzed me as emotional, I said you were laughingly wrong, and you said that I didn’t get it, implying that you somehow know me better than I do, based on an internet forum.
That’s pretty rich indeed.
Duro5341
Registered
Unfortunately those who say it as they see it are usually seen as abrasive or an a$$hole.....................myself included.
Most people in society unfortunately are lambs, and prefer you to sugar coat a lie for them to believe, than tell them the truth.
Unfortunately for the majority to see the truth about what's going on in this world, they would be forced to question the very foundation of their belief system. Most in society believe that the government would NEVER hurt them, and always has their best interests at heart..............which couldn't be further from the actual truth. Most citizens are happy to believe the lie that their little life matters to those running the country, and happy to believe their existence is important to those making the decisions for them.
Most of the country is full of "obedient slaves" and that's just how the deep state likes it............................How dare someone think for themselves, or make a decision for themselves, the deep state knows best for them. (Sarcasm OFF)
Cameron
FYI you’ll be competing with the other know it alls around here if you keep saying that you know what most of the people in society think. Jus sayin…
Not really worth responding to.
But for what it is worth, as far as I can remember, I mentioned emotional decision. Black car hot Arizona sun.
Please show me where I psycho analyzed you?
You really need to find some more important stuff to reply to.
I normally judge the size of a man by the size of the things which upsets him.
You want me to go back and count how many times you called me an emotional thinker, after several times I told you I’m not? I’m a calculating thinker, wish I had more passion or anger sometimes. We didn’t agree on the car color scenario. I said fear and anxiety would make a person compromise their choices, you said black car attracts heat. I used psychology and you used science. Neither one of us used emotion.
We’re both analytical, we just just don’t agree on almost anything.
By the way, I lived in the San Fernando Valley, Woodland Hills, for 15 years, drove two black vehicles without issue. The heat there rivals Arizona, if you’re not familiar.
What is really funny, is that you read post 1722 and said it is not hard to understand, in my response that you don’t get it.
You actually quoted it in bold.
But you still don’t get it.
If you possess no emotional thinking, you are either an AI driven robot, or a human with zero empathy, void of emotions. I know you are neither.
Last edited:
Post 1701. What you were replying to:
You said that you determined, over a number of my posts, that I am a predominantly emotional thinker. I told you I wasn't, and you said that I "didn't get it", as in I don't understand my own thought process. Whether you forgot the context or you're being a butthole, it doesn't really matter.
Of course I have emotion; I'm human, but like you, I'm mostly an analytical thinker, perhaps to a fault. I was an Administration of Justice major; lots of psychology, which studies emotion yet stresses that emotion should not be used in the administration of the science. It reinforced how I've always thought, since young.
This thread is supposed to be about Isreal, maybe we should take this to PM.
Last edited:
Yes, at the end of the day, this is not about you, it is about the war in Israel.
Zerks
Registered
When religion is used as a guiding practice to acquire an area not belonging to them. In my opinion it is a dishonest act of totalitarian control disguised as a religion.
He's not human and has zero empathy. Remember he was upset at the low number of kids killed in an airstrike and had hoped for more.
Bingo
That is a bit unfair Saiid.
This war could have been ended a while ago, with the right leadership in the White House.
I simply reminded someone of another's own words.
That person was disappointed a higher number of children weren't killed in an Israeli airstrike.
That person was disappointed a higher number of children weren't killed in an Israeli airstrike.
Since you seem to be up on that particular post (you’ve brought it up several times) how about reposting it here?
No point in opening that discussion with you once more. I tried to have an intellectual discussion with you, you refused to answer logical questions, threw red neck insults and hated me because I was not willing to lower myself to that level.
Zerks
Registered
This is Wuzza's typical response when confronted with questions that he can't articulate a rational answer for. He likes to throw in memes for dramatic effect at times too.
Sure let me go back thru 1700 posts and find it for you. Pffft
He ain't denying it. Instead he goes into insults and belittles people.
Said it back toward the beginning of all this. It's there.
I'd rather be a redneck non intellectual than a heartless scumbag who prays for higher numbers of dead kids.
'Shame it wasn't higher' in direct reference to an airstrike that killed KIDS
You should vote for Kamala, you seem to be just as expert as she is, at twisting someone’s words.
I think that sentence says all we need to know.
This is getting old Saiid:
By now we all know that you are anti semitic, we all know that you do not support our only ally in the Middle East, being Israel.
Last edited:
Similar threads
