I told you earlier that question was sophomoric and didn’t need answer.
I have studied the reason behind the conflict quite a bit. It is not what we were touching on, which is the opposite, the reason some Arabs and Israelis get along.
On the subjects this thread touches on, simple is as far as you’re capable of.
Actually, there are two answers, one from Israel and the West, the other from the viewpoint of the Arab nations. The truth gets a bit blurry between the two.
No 1996-2001. Today, we probably all use our phones, plus phone apps where there is no infrastructure.
I quoted it again so you can read it again.
Yes, there are legitimate answers to that question, no other intent was meant.
If you are referring to the question I asked Blanca, which Red so jubilantly attempted to answer, it dates back to what happened in 1948, how that was handled, there are different versions; and then in more recent times it dates back to Jassar Arafat's reign and what followed.
No, I didn't quote anyone....I was just thinking out loud I guess....and how other battlefields relate to what is happening in Gaza/Lebanon now....
In the first world, where we may have totally different beliefs, we all stand together when it is really needed. With that paradigm, it is hard to understand how around the globe, people are still at war killing each other. It kind of compares to nature, the Grizzly, or the African Lion, fight to the death for leadership and territory.
Mankind is a warring, violent race.....if we were from another planet arriving here and monitoring humans, we'd certainly not want to make contact with any nation.
That is the third time in a few posts that you have alluded to having to teach me something. The condescending tone is annoying and the implication that you are the smartest one in the room is also. Teach us in your areas of expertise but don’t pretend to know everything, because no one is buying it.
Let’s just say, I was a good student of yours, when it comes to dealing out sarcasm. You should probably learn to receiving as much as you give.
I asked you if you were a blithering idiot. I think you’ve questioned my reading comprehension at least twice since then.
Hi. Iranian proxy today killed 3 US solders and 8 are in and critical condition and 34 were injured. What should we do? May be Biden or Harris who ever is running the US today could ask them very nicely to not do it again. Or we could just give Iran a few hundread millions of dollars. OR kill a few hundread of theres.
When one suggests more direct involvement by the President and Vice President with the rulers in Iran, Israel, Yemen and Lebanon will show leadership, and the reply is that BB makes that impossible, one can only assume the suggestion was not understood.
On the first, I’ll grant you it’s the more popular sentiment. I’m an isolationist to a fault. I care, but my general rule is people’s business is people’s business. Declared war is a different story. Biden or Harris should try advising Bibi again, but direct involvement with Iran I don’t personally think is a good idea.
Perhaps I was in business too long. At the end of the day, it is not about how smart we are, about our skill sets, or how many hours we put in. Success is about building relationships, followed by communication and negotiation. And when things are really of utmost importance, a personal approach is always better than just sending in subordinates.
Hate to bust your liberal bubble... things have changed since you moved. Was California even a sanctuary state when you lived here?
