Not sure I agree with this. All they undercut is the dog, not the teeth - the amount of metal they remove compared to how much is there is tiny. I see no downside whatsoever to undercutting (besides the added expense of machining time).Because back cutting a gear weakens it. The first to second shift is generally the most brutal, especially when not using the clutch. Suzuki engineered it for strength.Ok. When my tranny went out I sent it out to have it back-cut. I asked the machinist what he thought about the tranny and he said every gear was already back-cut except for 2nd. Why???
Guys are running undercut stock gears on 300+ hp bikes all the time.
Just my opinion - could be (and often am) wrong.